From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"jon@solid-run.com" <jon@solid-run.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:00:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9da65c2504b944398188e468eac1abff@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210805080724.480-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Hi Robin/Lorenzo,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iommu [mailto:iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf
> Of Shameer Kolothum
> Sent: 05 August 2021 09:07
> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com; jon@solid-run.com; Linuxarm
> <linuxarm@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>;
> Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang
> <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
>
> Hi,
>
> The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> Revision E.b -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe
> memory ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity
> mapping in SMMU.
>
> We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these
> controllers make use of host memory for various caching related
> purposes and when SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to
> access these memory regions as there is no mapping for them.
> IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to describe and report these
> memory regions so that the kernel can make a unity mapping for
> these in SMMU.
>
> Change History:
>
> v6 --> v7
>
> The only change from v6 is the fix pointed out by Steve to
> the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install in patch #8.
>
> Thanks to the Tested-by tags by Laurentiu with SMMUv2 and
> Hanjun/Huiqiang with SMMUv3 for v6. I haven't added the tags
> yet as the series still needs more review[1].
>
> Feedback and tests on this series is very much appreciated.
Since we have an update to IORT spec(E.c) now[1] and includes additional
attributes/flags for the RMR node, I am planning to respin this series soon.
Going through the new spec, I have a few queries,
The memory range attributes can now be described as one of the following,
0x00: Device-nGnRnE memory
0x01: Device-nGnRE memory
0x02: Device-nGRE memory
0x03: Device-GRE memory
0x04: Normal Inner Non-cacheable Outer Non-cacheable
0x05: Normal Inner Write-back Outer Write-back Inner Shareable
I am not sure how this needs to be captured and used in the kernel. Is there
any intention of using these fine-grained attributes in the kernel now
or a generic mapping of the above to the struct iommu_rev_region prot field
is enough? i.e., something like,
{
....
prot = IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE;
if (rmr_attr == normal_mem) // 0x05
prot |= IOMMU_CACHE;
if (rmr_attr == device_mem) { //0x00 - 0x03
prot |= IOMMU_MMIO;
prot |= IOMMU_NOEXEC;
}
....
}
Similarly for the 'flags' field, the new 'Access Privilege' is intended to set the
IOMMU_PRIV ?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Shameer
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/ec/?lang=en
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-25 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 8:07 [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-20 10:22 ` Steven Price
2021-10-08 12:14 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09 6:57 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 5:47 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 13:47 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 16:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:31 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 18:37 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-06 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 19:51 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 7:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16 7:52 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 8:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16 11:16 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-17 11:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-05 10:53 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-08 12:48 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09 7:06 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 14:04 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-12 8:00 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 12:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 13:26 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 14:37 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 15:11 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 5:59 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:03 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 5:51 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 15:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force bypass Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:09 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09 7:07 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 15:00 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:42 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 14:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-31 5:06 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-30 9:47 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 10:50 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 13:00 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi [this message]
2022-01-25 19:30 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9da65c2504b944398188e468eac1abff@huawei.com \
--to=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jon@solid-run.com \
--cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).