From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945A3C5ACAE for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4BD206A5 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="zQWgVC5t" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730895AbfILJ4C (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:56:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:38441 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730851AbfILJ4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:56:00 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id y23so22634443ljn.5 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:55:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=329cG7VF2FWSqrxDIURXoF4mNurdRp+cB0ol/yD2IWM=; b=zQWgVC5tdLMykaX4/vwY9NwQnl84kGz+E6G4gmnU7E7z3xPgxUBAJuq/KLQlPf1oam RdLkgwT7ktokKveMir+dbsSJjHyajz6I6pmACAQ/vaCXqP1u+H53qJ9UGfH9Rqw4f+BS F8tIL5183K5mqiZie+gUfjKim5aKDftgnnpqvro3Rlrly4++DaglYIiO64u3PqxKyEqS vgu3cD+nTugMhX7gSo0wLYQx22Wjix5fu1vewOQSg/1dXyjPdDlBL2ZYcPZ7siq3qChf T+vLBgVhPJk/tcy3slq1OFZi3PAwqOrLAaNYWiAa1505El6PWxe3yZ95a9+Hy+PVW/Ih wamA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=329cG7VF2FWSqrxDIURXoF4mNurdRp+cB0ol/yD2IWM=; b=qsUCRtV7SIRbnb74+I2R+arY/BU+dVkFAPnlsvqQorwQdZfC6+jFgFcZjtoc+NEAbu X93u7qSyongE1/jwSHVIMW57K+I3YbSJzqfqU/EgiIf8g4i93ChFRugFtzNBV1qis9UK a9ueC9KvA6jHSFUl9vHkxroOok0c1VeNab0IEeVyXML1NHNW5fv9H9/sym3yZExpsvF8 E20VaOJ95q07dEpYA6PfuTFfV+orPHKFNkB4uyyYJXOvmURN6/r/D+gIhsl1S/BG2Yui sbdgj5Ra/osh4+425W37TCHeRQDww8CFVd+VpnLsEIpoariTnkuFnY+sh/T0AWH/cV9q k/wg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVTni3VyFg/CN5k8dyYMhVeSlJbwVQ6hMWGvSp2nWWKXe8A0vp7 7NxvFje2zXu6WvMf4SUS0GfC4SpsepDW0zWHx7lWgwwdlhscfw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzzu1xektMPHWgtffW/ZJV0KpU2PYzjtvuUtd9AIHNy13c8WglMkiuJC9aHP7eR5XUK9IR4cvejz1fmBwj4RE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a408:: with SMTP id p8mr25771055ljn.54.1568282158508; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:55:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Andrew Lunn , Andrzej Hajda , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , Russell King , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into > individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied. I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1. But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days" then I'm game for an immutable branch as well. Yours, Linus Walleij