Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] driver core: Allow a device to wait on optional suppliers

[Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>]

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:05 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 11:35:28 PM CET Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Looks like I squashed/rebased a bit incorrectly. It's fixed in the
> > next patch in the series.
>
> Well, that still is somewhat bisection-unfriendly.

Agreed. I was just answering why it compiled fine. Sorry about the
screw up. Any sorry about the accidental top posting last time.

-Saravana

>
>
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, October 28, 2019 11:00:23 PM CET Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > Before this change, if a device is waiting on suppliers, it's assumed
> > > > that all those suppliers are needed for the device to probe
> > > > successfully. This change allows marking a devices as waiting only on
> > > > optional suppliers. This allows a device to wait on suppliers (and link
> > > > to them as soon as they are available) without preventing the device
> > > > from being probed.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/base/core.c    | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  include/linux/device.h |  3 +++
> > > >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > > > index 17ed054c4132..48cd43a91ce6 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> > > > @@ -480,13 +480,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_add);
> > > >   * This function is NOT meant to be called from the probe function of the
> > > >   * consumer but rather from code that creates/adds the consumer device.
> > > >   */
> > > > -static void device_link_wait_for_supplier(struct device *consumer)
> > > > +static void device_link_wait_for_supplier(struct device *consumer,
> > > > +                                       bool need_for_probe)
> > > >  {
> > > >       mutex_lock(&wfs_lock);
> > > >       list_add_tail(&consumer->links.needs_suppliers, &wait_for_suppliers);
> > > > +     consumer->links.need_for_probe = need_for_probe;
> > > >       mutex_unlock(&wfs_lock);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static void device_link_wait_for_mandatory_supplier(struct device *consumer)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     device_link_wait_for_supplier(consumer, true);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void device_link_wait_for_optional_supplier(struct device *consumer)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     device_link_wait_for_supplier(consumer, false);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  /**
> > > >   * device_link_add_missing_supplier_links - Add links from consumer devices to
> > > >   *                                       supplier devices, leaving any
> > > > @@ -656,7 +668,8 @@ int device_links_check_suppliers(struct device *dev)
> > > >        * probe.
> > > >        */
> > > >       mutex_lock(&wfs_lock);
> > > > -     if (!list_empty(&dev->links.needs_suppliers)) {
> > > > +     if (!list_empty(&dev->links.needs_suppliers) &&
> > > > +         dev->links.need_for_probe) {
> > > >               mutex_unlock(&wfs_lock);
> > > >               return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > > >       }
> > > > @@ -760,6 +773,15 @@ void device_links_driver_bound(struct device *dev)
> > > >  {
> > > >       struct device_link *link;
> > > >
> > > > +     /*
> > > > +      * If a device probes successfully, it's expected to have created all
> > > > +      * the device links it needs to or make new device links as it needs
> > > > +      * them. So, it no longer needs to wait on any suppliers.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +     mutex_lock(&wfs_lock);
> > > > +     list_del_init(&dev->links.needs_suppliers);
> > > > +     mutex_unlock(&wfs_lock);
> > > > +
> > > >       device_links_write_lock();
> > > >
> > > >       list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) {
> > > > @@ -2393,7 +2415,7 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
> > > >
> > > >       if (fwnode_has_op(dev->fwnode, add_links)
> > > >           && fwnode_call_int_op(dev->fwnode, add_links, dev))
> > > > -             device_link_wait_for_supplier(dev);
> > > > +             device_link_wait_for_mandatory_supplier(dev, true);
> > >
> > > Does this compile even?
> > >
> > > The function takes one argument according to the definition above ...
> > >
> > > >       bus_probe_device(dev);
> > > >       if (parent)
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> > > > index f1f2aa0b19da..4fd33da9a848 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > > > @@ -1156,6 +1156,8 @@ enum dl_dev_state {
> > > >   * @consumers: List of links to consumer devices.
> > > >   * @needs_suppliers: Hook to global list of devices waiting for suppliers.
> > > >   * @defer_sync: Hook to global list of devices that have deferred sync_state.
> > > > + * @need_for_probe: If needs_suppliers is on a list, this indicates if the
> > > > + *               suppliers are needed for probe or not.
> > > >   * @status: Driver status information.
> > > >   */
> > > >  struct dev_links_info {
> > > > @@ -1163,6 +1165,7 @@ struct dev_links_info {
> > > >       struct list_head consumers;
> > > >       struct list_head needs_suppliers;
> > > >       struct list_head defer_sync;
> > > > +     bool need_for_probe;
> > > >       enum dl_dev_state status;
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>