From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E663C54FCF for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8062098B for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WL57huwo" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727066AbgCXKZE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:25:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:36962 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726524AbgCXKZD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:25:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a32so8810157pga.4; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:25:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=niMBZQskqIvvbvSQd3Vs9C4OFVhjiYiDfUEWD3hhgQU=; b=WL57huwoohYOXgJDpFwNTccWhDvbdVj53HP9RTAYqeUArAowfq+8wm7C8xnQS+d7Xg T6ZEXRd83CkutsSV26moPh6SFShAu8y5bgcdaa94+vyt5gv9L7FHOWY/xTwiS3ZXTJoo mYyatVs+4JSkglhV/DZno5DkKWgsDuV6Nq3GIgrszTouv3+HdzH3Ue4zNWg9IJabYRM5 Yc/KKpuGqrb71fAUqQdj6kfvkI7Fc5ogXvzI4kRXgF1utZe1N1Trsq00q5ItgQsyJMa1 K51p515UguhiI4YjD4zkfxOZoju5Vs4RIc7CzfPQSFesYRhhKwf5f8kTncK3eqxsX1rE yirA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=niMBZQskqIvvbvSQd3Vs9C4OFVhjiYiDfUEWD3hhgQU=; b=MzFd2Jhj6NnyoTXDhkIDFXZaVVEeeRk7Ymt0c9yhAa02N+aUf3a2bgMGpJVsI0eyeb dOiCM7PPIjQ7Vy9vzvWavWC/dB5HRgGAX84io8H7x8yQwYGe45tzV8kg3FmX5+KuoT5t 4deALsSaFDZjh44GUqT0q4JNNoF+98YMHrDsQhiKmkzRmTvZDXMjkjFRs22HbctASBKf fsytqVC2ZwiG3APXDtOU2kuJmfobubjcFW+5LF70sJzJrqTcnH9PkrIyHA/F0/SmkjI4 u3ABbxCxzs7gfxoQZu9QRHtG5xcWiv9ikSPZ1eKCmWL/z1c0mU8DJnGlrg+/XBlexkNE vtBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1JOAWWi5gPBJvE5LVcy14E2W0ND1MVLJbZRfqVsZSxIOEgewVQ l7nJZI/CkU4AdsGKMvy4n0CbhmtUPRNG4ZxZcbc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtRP5kcse4VydJXhIWcSQg5qG4qh1fLLlH+sYOY0YXmbvxSTKNtq7OW900chK9pK0hyoRdDWpT1dROadSow+qU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2b4:: with SMTP id q20mr17417161pfs.36.1585045502171; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:25:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <20200324060124.GC11705@shao2-debian> In-Reply-To: <20200324060124.GC11705@shao2-debian> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:24:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression To: kernel test robot Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Chanwoo Choi , Jacob Pan , Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , ALSA Development Mailing List , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto , lkp@lists.01.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit: > commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros") > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729 > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next > > in testcase: will-it-scale > on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory > with following parameters: drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator, perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and reordering lines may affect this. Can you restore terminator there and re-test? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko