From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6985FC433DF for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FA3206F6 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AMIIT2ei" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726381AbgGXUUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:20:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45848 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726083AbgGXUUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:20:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61ECDC0619D3; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id k27so6013890pgm.2; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:20:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LdGo5gLqICRp7zs+7G5ug48iKskyEOsTuq55Ciwe614=; b=AMIIT2eivh94UzAlbtkWbP2hXnm5WJhexzIa8bXIxWAuYeyNbTaCYkriNDE/ITIAsD Z9kVUcuq5h11XuabG9rZKIS40nF41MSAJzX51VqoIREKk+FDWaXhr8gj+JQcT4TFh1qp VlQL3mK9/4CpU1GSmNyn7hX9Zb3QB//tiCTnpIOfvJbaTM7Jf5ordMMjqh5G7qTVRvJA 4aoRDMz1UCjbnj5R9anUtk30sJFmKqpbZLUc9Vy1HqYzGShzvJ0/hAdgHeBtXmk9MDFw 0RY+3H6k7Zujgr4yd3hpQn4ZbWT6+6kG1kNFmoeMl8CpcDFPf6J/RTPXlvYbFEB7pnEB uMbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LdGo5gLqICRp7zs+7G5ug48iKskyEOsTuq55Ciwe614=; b=m7Yf0Hfgyj2KHrKUEsFqdmYqVQZyHDFNuNS5drfHszdrJ7kbxP0ID0Oh8BxAH9B8bR hnhumKT74kBtBevySRgLLr2UoN5MDU5ggw4+lLbVOkQuuy1bcrUalpKR6huAyKffTiuF xd8ox0nQ+9H0ZQuxPSfaekYALYKhkZKzfgmi/fJ85mkPtoPe14ZfSQAOZexr20eNXjiq yR7XaNhiKhzxdUyc5uCbVRmG0w5r8EImcIHx3qKrFYCLmXvgrmWnIkGZceP4gv97BsVE WLTJUZQVdUKSL4qhIYaVt0Ykm2LmysUOO2svGlJMj3ORZrNTOzjb4il0zPO8cJRXjy/E JFfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/pshP49dTcKHMVICXwcY16e2prQ0WiGGGcjpVRzrxzyyD1FFB x46dQLOIW82Zt7qy8fZkA21PHxBE50/SdI4rIU92i4FM X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDi5Igt/PJ1+N4Wr0tOacThVVjlGsiS0o0Ff/MOHowPFup9iEAeBeyvYtjm0k0PBwVZmt2Rkodc3dkY/Cvwy0= X-Received: by 2002:a63:a05f:: with SMTP id u31mr9788553pgn.4.1595622020840; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:20:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <20200715090400.4733-2-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <1a031e62-1e87-fdc1-b672-e3ccf3530fda@arm.com> <20200724133931.GF1472201@lunn.ch> <97973095-5458-8ac2-890c-667f4ea6cd0e@arm.com> <20200724192008.GI1594328@lunn.ch> <2fee02c2-4404-cd2e-8889-97e512a117f4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2fee02c2-4404-cd2e-8889-97e512a117f4@gmail.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:20:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jeremy Linton , Calvin Johnson , Russell King - ARM Linux admin , Jon , Cristi Sovaiala , Ioana Ciornei , Madalin Bucur , netdev , linux.cj@gmail.com, ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:13 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 7/24/20 1:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > >> I think we need to NACK all attempts to add ACPI support to phylib and > >> phylink until an authoritative ACPI Linux maintainer makes an > >> appearance and actively steers the work. And not just this patchset, > >> but all patchsets in the networking domain which have an ACPI > >> component. > > > > It's funny, since I see ACPI mailing list and none of the maintainers > > in the Cc here... > > I'm not sure they pay attention to some (noise-like?) activity which > > (from their perspective) happens on unrelated lists. > > If you what you describe here is their perception of what is going on > here, that is very encouraging, we are definitively going to make progress. I can't speak for them. As a maintainer in other areas I expect that people Cc explicitly maintainer(s) if they want more attention. Otherwise I look at the mails to the mailing list just from time to time. But this is my expectation, don't take me wrong. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko