From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DAFC433F5 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B5860F50 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231532AbhIUMPg (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:15:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33266 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231211AbhIUMPf (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:15:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E4BC061574; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id v24so73536048eda.3; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:14:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EA2T5sDryf1wshg82J637OYfNBLeVAzy/N9k8uhkKT8=; b=qZ6jLDrl1r/sGyHAotEko+QsWepOgK3neypqxen2BDwFbOyCNiD9DZZReBipSyZTKT /HOeM4NPjWDsmGxDjphfovxqkD/d14Z7fM+h2ZA/8T9HeZcsKLW6BHJ1cqyN0SX73Zn7 jHZW693e1ONmRgl0WCnh6kEkwGUsWBmuKyKpy1SNr448N2wyrL2B9ZgLmepokfWtP4e2 3Knmk7jAIgBey5wfCM75OofTo/Swa2MkfVNn+H5gAoL0c9xK2oPPln0bwTBZJYbmgt2c lDOs8hOio67hYgybSBI7mgZUVMtHvBltLbBvqs5PZaFOE0rDdVke74vywzEOJrYtYdYS 0m+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EA2T5sDryf1wshg82J637OYfNBLeVAzy/N9k8uhkKT8=; b=8JRFM0PWMae4z+5qZ3xwMqhMFxYAtFDHfrMqktlAUDpG9lrxzLBanYO+LYGxb/Kt+V q9LQJaM2HVyUBKZOLQppB7Lxg8A82p+9vdxDByi5cI/5xxh9lWy0hxSnVIRCtVhMGnvG 9OViNeMODVjc4ETnSILQ+wk8CSPOnKI4leKWxjab2rWYNneTThf8Dt1EKu6lKBzY1zQz KdQph8dMPZztXm1JR20OrRNCVyJTwqKxnDn+UCiRtvXOWYnZXIqgvMmX3OYx+Rm6mtJw ircg6dfz/x6HYmxg0mPGu6mNH7YVtPAzvb6sEniCMEzo1Drvle/deayKbejIvdk26ACm l2WA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312WFcCbrcaOZN7JgZRKakXCrozZFEVzUJavAreL6W8ihcZB/X9 4/bdlNBr524oeJYsTurnbIsuQJa2sODKdNpAB1A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYckj7Qew5qhg3H25MAZrv1yE2lUHXGxCKD0KdGmz+WWCcporJRB70briSvnRZrWy+dQE8/VzVKcELZ0f7iLg= X-Received: by 2002:a50:e188:: with SMTP id k8mr14443733edl.119.1632226442003; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:14:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210816104119.75019-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <16df7a43-919b-5ad7-7ca7-025c669ba32f@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16df7a43-919b-5ad7-7ca7-025c669ba32f@redhat.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:13:23 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH regression fix v2] gpiolib: acpi: Make set-debounce-timeout failures non fatal To: Hans de Goede Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 7:47 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > On 8/16/21 2:28 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 8/16/21 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:41:19PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: ... > >> Yes, I also think that we need to choose upper debounce instead of rejecting > >> the settings. And yes, I agree that for now it's not suitable as a fix. > >> > >> That said, > >> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko > > > > Thank you. > > > > FYI, I've prepared a patch to choose the upper debounce time for > > pintctrl-baytrail . I'll test it when I'm back home tonight and > > then submit it upstream. > > Ugh, I just noticed that this is still not upstream (not in v5.15-rc2), while this is > a regression fix! I think it was late for Bart to pick this up. > Can we please get this merged and send to Linus ASAP ? I'm on vacations now, but if Mika or Bart or Linus can handle this, my tag is there :) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko