From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4B0C4332B for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE019208C3 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Skn7flJS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727202AbgCTVw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:52:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:46201 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgCTVw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:52:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id c19so3965104pfo.13; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a04BEXBq6T16pF8YgWqXF8qeXZZehjOHDxhsKaZX814=; b=Skn7flJSlYGzwEVidWCfP5Sxs1un6UzXQtQz+bWdWoAKNnRM80PqPvhDZwvv2wJKw6 Mj81HfQM/zfiGt9ileOkKRRQWiF7jWjG6JhV+9WIbVnMz/dnDuFUHCHtIbQX4/CY7DkK noOtt/A9DKzcRzAlH+RqcMdMCY2dyTdaWE9AE5cShMSjs4HBzANhTM2+7CpxOlPpNBsU 9nhE6/1XKN4/0cmtxXDNEwjoXngQLqF8QiIUQVIm1NRPbQReCnfpG/6XbUusceYyN0mz qR1CBCi2y2i3OXLUvaPOWqAKkvUGIR4nJ+prrBs7mnq20vlj/y21DMR6IS0a4SS96qyg vOYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a04BEXBq6T16pF8YgWqXF8qeXZZehjOHDxhsKaZX814=; b=osqubrMHaroAdX2xmT5TcDKYfdmAD2rMkehhh4Gjs6SU9CAVegfxsZ/rvJVGVvKVFz Bp/ePrg74/IzI2RMVmLRIumo6AhN55yNnBupg84Yka97VGX+Ju6Qc+hSuJn3CaeNUmZb NWABF2Df3o+Qu6Om8CCwyr7I/1tp0/Qz0grX/AHAFaS6J1+eL72L8PQ+La7TCzwricRJ tRpnhaEkAG71W9VCt9IZr2oN0wnK4hGC7yhIX6UZyu3QTvZtlRVSClNYoH4zp4ZHbaQe rnoAjskCtXhlg5ee4Wc/mya6JnqCmro/bbfv+OzrnQjdbfEoLD0ATwp3+t3z6HLJmvQB VK1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0PnxycUN+1pg4nT0yArAW59uWKknhE+IZQ1BEByRakKPx41L48 mMNWjfI7jzf2fsAQ425fXk55KAHoHQiix6AltUE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsmV5czmNKtoJg0C7AeN7wX4S5Al3MMjqsDaMzJBp9Kh1vmxFKQ2VcZyX/I27EONEdC3cCFyRbcSUnbF2ixLdU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2b4:: with SMTP id q20mr178775pfs.36.1584741173473; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:52:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Chanwoo Choi , Jacob Pan , Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , ALSA Development Mailing List , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? > > Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 > is not really any better Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... Or is it for any family? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko