From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26853C433FE for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 11:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DFC6124F for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 11:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234217AbhJELFu (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:05:50 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-f54.google.com ([209.85.161.54]:40752 "EHLO mail-oo1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233449AbhJELFt (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:05:49 -0400 Received: by mail-oo1-f54.google.com with SMTP id j11-20020a4a92cb000000b002902ae8cb10so6274311ooh.7; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 04:03:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rbQR10SUFcLSb0CqZ3+0KI2N/KoBUg4lIS8MaCYfWzA=; b=uTRXokuJvnnt9xhRhvKk7nmg9P1L43vtMvvkzf5c7uTPaL5O6Dm116xMRTZRZLMOKD fojp1hYG7NkIA9hcGEnMqAxJiWVk7tjgJvK8DtXNeyQQqS7cg/EJjHrV9BvN2Z4z56jI auEN2JL0rm9iHJXOVNMEWGLCRuuvyLLFYQ8tBwoYpbYmm6x7Zj22BlEoIkmscDl+fdH5 tkKXAnyEhlL7unmkR0KeV3Zd43U00mmYfnXhAZHZ7N/Cg7NpNn5s8ZZ7wN59fescRBEz 3jXXD+sRiUyrA47RR8tx2FCxMPDbNTdNh0382at7NxCDuNjDAqqPEmXcsiaVwOmfnS8G P3Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ar+fZq1ruftRtomp4A+sgIEHTZi+HxKS8HktX7BrEcxPVQtJ8 xa6J21cuzsIhE/yIGIk5ZPOdfXBlntJaqI/Ffmc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxripPRp/2cLwKftBJJECVik2j1AfoGQDmRIUHPdG4gKa29qqGW4SnWQFEZNeKgTv6jZa4cvNpPu7oUx2ePtCo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:17a:: with SMTP id k26mr12930860ood.37.1633431839035; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 04:03:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher> <7312660.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:03:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions To: Ferry Toth Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 10:14 PM Ferry Toth wrote: > > Hi, > > Op 29-09-2021 om 20:05 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki: > > Hi All, > > > > This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next > > > > which should be included in linux-next. > > > > Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI: > > Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/ > > > > and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that > > series. The rest of that series is present in the git branch above. > > > > All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that > > there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them. > > > > Ferry, please test! > > This is how I tested: > 3 patches from > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/2793105.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher/ > on top of 5.15.0-rc2 as before > 4 patches from v2 in the order of linux-pm.git > then tested without, with 1/3, 1+2/3, 1+2+3/3 on top (with only 3/3 the > new patch, 1+2/3 taken from v2 as they are unchanged). > > In all 4 cases I didn't find any trouble (related to this patch). > > Thanks for doing this! Thank you!