From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)"
<devel@acpica.org>, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cpufreq: Migrate users of policy notifiers to QoS requests
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iqYHNt6NQy3Fi1B=XtjNOm2x0mX3+7eWBREgFZRpUS+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1563269894.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:49 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Now that cpufreq core supports taking QoS requests for min/max cpu
> frequencies, lets migrate rest of the users to using them instead of the
> policy notifiers.
Technically, this still is linux-next only. :-)
> The CPUFREQ_NOTIFY and CPUFREQ_ADJUST events of the policy notifiers are
> removed as a result, but we have to add CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY and
> CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY events to it for the acpi stuff specifically. So
> the policy notifiers aren't completely removed.
That's not entirely accurate, because arch_topology is going to use
CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY now too.
> Boot tested on my x86 PC and ARM hikey board. Nothing looked broken :)
>
> This has already gone through build bot for a few days now.
So I'd prefer patches [5-8] to go right after the first one and then
do the cleanups on top of that, as somebody may want to backport the
essential changes without the cleanups.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-16 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-16 9:48 [PATCH 00/10] cpufreq: Migrate users of policy notifiers to QoS requests Viresh Kumar
2019-07-16 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-07-16 10:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-16 10:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0iqYHNt6NQy3Fi1B=XtjNOm2x0mX3+7eWBREgFZRpUS+w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=erik.schmauss@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).