linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] ACPI: property: Allow counting a single value as an array of 1 element
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:01:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jq1+q3HKDEzgBUWtZY8H0kaiR=bNi1WUsdg3BTAyiPgw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCPyKjO7XPBFAgbn@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:48:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:31:48 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 1:36:00 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Rafael, thanks for the review, my answers below.
>
> > > > > We allow to read the single value as a first element in the array.
> > > > > Unfortunately the counting doesn't work in this case and we can't
> > > > > call fwnode_property_count_*() API without getting an error.
> > > >
> > > > It would be good to mention what the symptom of the issue is here.
>
> fwnode_property_match_string() is not working as reported by Calvin.
>
> > > > > Modify acpi_data_prop_read() to always try the single value read
> > > > > and thus allow counting the single value as an array of 1 element.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > This is a bug fix, so it should go in before the cleanups in this series IMO.
>
> Seems it was never worked, hence neither Fixes tag nor...
>
> > > > Also it looks like stable@vger material.
>
> ...Cc to stable@.
>
> > > > > -       if (val && nval == 1) {
> > > > > +       /* Try to read as a single value first */
> > > > > +       if (!val || nval == 1) {
> > > > >                 ret = acpi_data_prop_read_single(data, propname, proptype, val);
> > > >
> > > > This returns -EINVAL if val is NULL.
>
> Nope. That's why it's a patch 7. Patch 6 solves this.

That's my point.  Patch 7 should be the first one in the series.

> > > > >                 if (ret >= 0)
> > > > > -                       return ret;
> > > > > +                       return val ? ret : 1;
> > > >
> > > > So val cannot be NULL here.
>
> Why not? I have changed conditional.
>
> > > > >         }
>
> > > > To me, acpi_fwnode_property_read_string_array() needs to special-case
> > > > val == NULL and nval == 0.
>
> nval can be anything in the case of val==NULL. So far neither of your proposals
> conform this.

That is if !val and nval != 0 is regarded as a valid combination of
arguments, but is it?

If that is the case, the check in acpi_data_prop_read() in the last
patch that I posted needs to be (!val || nval == 1), but that would be
it, no?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10 11:43 [PATCH v1 1/7] ACPI: property: Remove dead code Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] ACPI: property: Make acpi_node_prop_read() static Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] ACPI: property: Satisfy kernel doc validator (part 1) Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] ACPI: property: Satisfy kernel doc validator (part 2) Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] ACPI: property: Refactor acpi_data_prop_read_single() Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] ACPI: property: Allow to validate a single value Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] ACPI: property: Allow counting a single value as an array of 1 element Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 12:36   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-10 13:31     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-10 13:48       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-10 14:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 15:01           ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-02-10 15:41             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-10 15:44               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-11 15:42                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-11 16:39                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0jq1+q3HKDEzgBUWtZY8H0kaiR=bNi1WUsdg3BTAyiPgw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).