Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] device property: Keep dev_fwnode() and dev_fwnode_const() separate

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 9:36 AM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It's not fully correct to take a const parameter pointer to a struct
> > and return a non-const pointer to a member of that struct.
> >
> > Instead, introduce a const version of the dev_fwnode() API which takes
> > and returns const pointers and use it where it's applicable.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: aade55c86033 ("device property: Add const qualifier to device_get_match_data() parameter")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> For the whole series:
>
> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/property.c  | 11 +++++++++--
> >  include/linux/property.h |  3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> > index 4d6278a84868..699f1b115e0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> > @@ -17,13 +17,20 @@
> >  #include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/phy.h>
> >
> > -struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode(const struct device *dev)
> > +struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node ?
> >               of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node) : dev->fwnode;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_fwnode);
> >
> > +const struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode_const(const struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +     return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node ?
> > +             of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node) : dev->fwnode;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_fwnode_const);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * device_property_present - check if a property of a device is present
> >   * @dev: Device whose property is being checked
> > @@ -1202,7 +1209,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint);
> >
> >  const void *device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -     return fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode(dev), device_get_match_data, dev);
> > +     return fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode_const(dev), device_get_match_data, dev);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_match_data);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> > index 117cc200c656..ae5d7f8eccf4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/property.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ enum dev_dma_attr {
> >       DEV_DMA_COHERENT,
> >  };
> >
> > -struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode(const struct device *dev);
> > +struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode(struct device *dev);
> > +const struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode_const(const struct device *dev);
> >
> >  bool device_property_present(struct device *dev, const char *propname);
> >  int device_property_read_u8_array(struct device *dev, const char *propname,
> > --

So I would like all of you to see the response from Greg to the v2 of
this patch and provide your input in that thread:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/YzQqcFZtJn90URrJ@kroah.com/T/#u