From: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [pm:bleeding-edge 51/55] drivers//powercap/intel_rapl.c:1148:2: note: in expansion of macro 'INTEL_CPU_FAM6'
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:08:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae09fe46-2263-711d-de24-6b8158ca2bbd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201906181829.CstPoifV%lkp@intel.com>
On 18-Jun-19 3:59 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git bleeding-edge
> head: 02f436aad250841d42baf9a3c47ad5646eb4ad31
> commit: d2658d7b4985a4fdbdab02e0e651a5778ccfcf1c [51/55] powercap: rapl: Add Ice Lake NNPI support to RAPL driver
> config: x86_64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
> reproduce:
> git checkout d2658d7b4985a4fdbdab02e0e651a5778ccfcf1c
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from drivers//powercap/intel_rapl.c:25:0:
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h:97:23: error: 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_NNPI' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_X'?
This patch depends on
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=e32d045cd4ba06b59878323e434bad010e78e658
and that patch is already accepted.
> INTEL_CPU_FAM_ANY(6, INTEL_FAM6_##_model, _driver_data)
> ^
> arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h:91:12: note: in definition of macro 'INTEL_CPU_FAM_ANY'
> .model = _model, \
> ^~~~~~
>>> drivers//powercap/intel_rapl.c:1148:2: note: in expansion of macro 'INTEL_CPU_FAM6'
> INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ICELAKE_NNPI, rapl_defaults_core),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> --
> In file included from drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c:25:0:
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h:97:23: error: 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_NNPI' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_X'?
> INTEL_CPU_FAM_ANY(6, INTEL_FAM6_##_model, _driver_data)
> ^
> arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h:91:12: note: in definition of macro 'INTEL_CPU_FAM_ANY'
> .model = _model, \
> ^~~~~~
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c:1148:2: note: in expansion of macro 'INTEL_CPU_FAM6'
> INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ICELAKE_NNPI, rapl_defaults_core),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> vim +/INTEL_CPU_FAM6 +1148 drivers//powercap/intel_rapl.c
>
> 1123
> 1124 static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[] __initconst = {
> 1125 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SANDYBRIDGE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1126 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SANDYBRIDGE_X, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1127
> 1128 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(IVYBRIDGE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1129 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(IVYBRIDGE_X, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1130
> 1131 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(HASWELL_CORE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1132 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(HASWELL_ULT, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1133 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(HASWELL_GT3E, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1134 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(HASWELL_X, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),
> 1135
> 1136 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(BROADWELL_CORE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1137 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(BROADWELL_GT3E, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1138 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(BROADWELL_XEON_D, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1139 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(BROADWELL_X, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),
> 1140
> 1141 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_DESKTOP, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1142 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_MOBILE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1143 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_X, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),
> 1144 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(KABYLAKE_MOBILE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1145 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1146 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(CANNONLAKE_MOBILE, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1147 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ICELAKE_MOBILE, rapl_defaults_core),
>> 1148 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ICELAKE_NNPI, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1149
> 1150 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_SILVERMONT, rapl_defaults_byt),
> 1151 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_AIRMONT, rapl_defaults_cht),
> 1152 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID, rapl_defaults_tng),
> 1153 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_AIRMONT_MID, rapl_defaults_ann),
> 1154 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_GOLDMONT, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1155 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1156 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_GOLDMONT_X, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1157 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_TREMONT_X, rapl_defaults_core),
> 1158
> 1159 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(XEON_PHI_KNL, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),
> 1160 INTEL_CPU_FAM6(XEON_PHI_KNM, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),
> 1161 {}
> 1162 };
> 1163 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, rapl_ids);
> 1164
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-18 10:29 [pm:bleeding-edge 51/55] drivers//powercap/intel_rapl.c:1148:2: note: in expansion of macro 'INTEL_CPU_FAM6' kbuild test robot
2019-06-18 12:38 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae09fe46-2263-711d-de24-6b8158ca2bbd@linux.intel.com \
--to=rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).