linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	<lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:15:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4c4ba3a-b079-e276-f7bb-b91af7d95a7f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572916055-62477-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@huawei.com>

On 2019/11/5 9:07, Tian Tao wrote:
> acpi_find_cache_level with level parameter as a signed integer,
> is called by acpi_find_cache_node where the level parameter is unsigned.
> This in turn calls acpi_find_cache_level with the level parameter is
> signed.Make the type consistent as unsigned through all 3 calls.

I'm not against doing this, but it's not a big deal :)

Maybe send to upstream to see what's happening, Rafael is a nice guy.

Thanks
Hanjun
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index 5af1e9e..bbe9b7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_pptt_match_type(int table_type, int type)
>   *
>   * Return: The cache structure and the level we terminated with.
>   */
> -static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> -				int local_level,
> -				struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> -				struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> -				int level, int type)
> +static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> +					 unsigned int local_level,
> +					 struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> +					 struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> +					 unsigned int level, int type)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache;
>  
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
>  			if (*found != NULL && cache != *found)
>  				pr_warn("Found duplicate cache level/type unable to determine uniqueness\n");
>  
> -			pr_debug("Found cache @ level %d\n", level);
> +			pr_debug("Found cache @ level %u\n", level);
>  			*found = cache;
>  			/*
>  			 * continue looking at this node's resource list
> @@ -132,16 +132,18 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
>  	return local_level;
>  }
>  
> -static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> -						     struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> -						     int *starting_level, int level,
> -						     int type)
> +static struct
> +acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> +					struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> +					unsigned int *starting_level,
> +					unsigned int level,
> +					int type)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_subtable_header *res;
> -	int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
> +	unsigned int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
>  	int resource = 0;
>  	struct acpi_pptt_cache *ret = NULL;
> -	int local_level;
> +	unsigned int local_level;
>  
>  	/* walk down from processor node */
>  	while ((res = acpi_get_pptt_resource(table_hdr, cpu_node, resource))) {
> @@ -318,15 +320,15 @@ static u8 acpi_cache_type(enum cache_type type)
>  static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
>  						    u32 acpi_cpu_id,
>  						    enum cache_type type,
> -						    int level,
> +						    unsigned int level,
>  						    struct acpi_pptt_processor **node)
>  {
> -	int total_levels = 0;
> +	unsigned int total_levels = 0;
>  	struct acpi_pptt_cache *found = NULL;
>  	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
>  	u8 acpi_type = acpi_cache_type(type);
>  
> -	pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %d cache type %d\n",
> +	pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %u cache type %d\n",
>  		 acpi_cpu_id, level, acpi_type);
>  
>  	cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05  1:07 [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right Tian Tao
2019-11-05  1:15 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2019-11-05  1:27   ` Hanjun Guo
2019-11-13 23:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4c4ba3a-b079-e276-f7bb-b91af7d95a7f@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tiantao6@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).