From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB78C5ACAE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2226B2081B for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="qKcY23mR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2226B2081B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=a8zAeTxPM3BdB00jjoJ1nhs14xZ/8wWU4ZpQ+srh9CA=; b=qKcY23mRU3YnLb DPFWZgeKhvdfW65dKKt+ciA90Ekob93Z2Feb5NAadubtJOg6Ntjm/9Wf/WqeTnoMOpsh35r8S5/Nh GqPY0coV14LuOmLJ/EGy/8rf1j3Qd6q9qnjRAuOKYQd0eR3gGxUHoBMMzjFc5/lHcy4/3IL4w1ugH vI+a9bSKPvzbnpTwJnR7cY7g2M+RS9E60nxo1hYC3dOygvaWDQ293LSlYALwLtf0RXrsdKbKaGTLH HwDa96QU7pAgDBvgBQUw+wXE+BPnn3dDaQYTTTEGaCOQ5A7ctwmIAlWoh0+NmnqBxxBaHyZLwfUcK XqUFXkJvTK8hgYpfgO9w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i80wY-0005gw-Gf; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:37:50 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i80vP-0005PH-S7; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:36:43 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C471570; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0CFF3F59C; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:36:34 +0100 From: Andrew Murray To: Neil Armstrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: amlogic: meson: Add support for G12A Message-ID: <20190911113633.GR9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1567950178-4466-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1567950178-4466-4-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1567950178-4466-4-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1+81 (426a6c1) (2018-08-26) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190911_043642_092690_BB23ADF4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com, repk@triplefau.lt, maz@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, yue.wang@Amlogic.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0000, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Add support for the Amlogic G12A SoC using a separate shared PHY. > > This adds support for fetching a PHY phandle and call the PHY init, > reset and power on/off calls instead of writing in the PHY register or > toggling the PHY reset line. > > The MIPI clock is also made optional since it is used for setting up Is it worth indicating here that the MIPI clock is *only required* for the G12A (or controllers with a shared phy)? It's still required for AXG. It's not optional for G12A - it's ignored. > the PHY reference clock chared with the DSI controller on AXG. s/chared/shared/ > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-meson.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-meson.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-meson.c > index ab79990798f8..3fadad381762 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-meson.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-meson.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "pcie-designware.h" > > @@ -96,12 +97,18 @@ struct meson_pcie_rc_reset { > struct reset_control *apb; > }; > > +struct meson_pcie_param { > + bool has_shared_phy; > +}; > + > struct meson_pcie { > struct dw_pcie pci; > struct meson_pcie_mem_res mem_res; > struct meson_pcie_clk_res clk_res; > struct meson_pcie_rc_reset mrst; > struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio; > + struct phy *phy; > + const struct meson_pcie_param *param; > }; > > static struct reset_control *meson_pcie_get_reset(struct meson_pcie *mp, > @@ -123,10 +130,12 @@ static int meson_pcie_get_resets(struct meson_pcie *mp) > { > struct meson_pcie_rc_reset *mrst = &mp->mrst; > > - mrst->phy = meson_pcie_get_reset(mp, "phy", PCIE_SHARED_RESET); > - if (IS_ERR(mrst->phy)) > - return PTR_ERR(mrst->phy); > - reset_control_deassert(mrst->phy); > + if (!mp->param->has_shared_phy) { > + mrst->phy = meson_pcie_get_reset(mp, "phy", PCIE_SHARED_RESET); > + if (IS_ERR(mrst->phy)) > + return PTR_ERR(mrst->phy); > + reset_control_deassert(mrst->phy); > + } > > mrst->port = meson_pcie_get_reset(mp, "port", PCIE_NORMAL_RESET); > if (IS_ERR(mrst->port)) > @@ -180,6 +189,9 @@ static int meson_pcie_get_mems(struct platform_device *pdev, > if (IS_ERR(mp->mem_res.cfg_base)) > return PTR_ERR(mp->mem_res.cfg_base); > > + if (mp->param->has_shared_phy) > + return 0; > + It may be more consistent if, rather than returning here, you wrapped the following 3 lines by the if statement. > /* Meson SoC has two PCI controllers use same phy register*/ I guess this comment should now be updated to refer to AXG? > mp->mem_res.phy_base = meson_pcie_get_mem_shared(pdev, mp, "phy"); > if (IS_ERR(mp->mem_res.phy_base)) > @@ -188,19 +200,33 @@ static int meson_pcie_get_mems(struct platform_device *pdev, > return 0; > } > > -static void meson_pcie_power_on(struct meson_pcie *mp) > +static int meson_pcie_power_on(struct meson_pcie *mp) > { > - writel(MESON_PCIE_PHY_POWERUP, mp->mem_res.phy_base); > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (mp->param->has_shared_phy) > + ret = phy_power_on(mp->phy); I haven't seen any phy_[init/exit] calls, should there be any? > + else > + writel(MESON_PCIE_PHY_POWERUP, mp->mem_res.phy_base); > + > + return ret; > } > > -static void meson_pcie_reset(struct meson_pcie *mp) > +static int meson_pcie_reset(struct meson_pcie *mp) > { > struct meson_pcie_rc_reset *mrst = &mp->mrst; > - > - reset_control_assert(mrst->phy); > - udelay(PCIE_RESET_DELAY); > - reset_control_deassert(mrst->phy); > - udelay(PCIE_RESET_DELAY); > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (mp->param->has_shared_phy) { > + ret = phy_reset(mp->phy); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } else { > + reset_control_assert(mrst->phy); > + udelay(PCIE_RESET_DELAY); > + reset_control_deassert(mrst->phy); > + udelay(PCIE_RESET_DELAY); > + } > > reset_control_assert(mrst->port); > reset_control_assert(mrst->apb); > @@ -208,6 +234,8 @@ static void meson_pcie_reset(struct meson_pcie *mp) > reset_control_deassert(mrst->port); > reset_control_deassert(mrst->apb); > udelay(PCIE_RESET_DELAY); > + > + return 0; > } > > static inline struct clk *meson_pcie_probe_clock(struct device *dev, > @@ -250,9 +278,11 @@ static int meson_pcie_probe_clocks(struct meson_pcie *mp) > if (IS_ERR(res->port_clk)) > return PTR_ERR(res->port_clk); > > - res->mipi_gate = meson_pcie_probe_clock(dev, "mipi", 0); > - if (IS_ERR(res->mipi_gate)) > - return PTR_ERR(res->mipi_gate); > + if (!mp->param->has_shared_phy) { > + res->mipi_gate = meson_pcie_probe_clock(dev, "mipi", 0); > + if (IS_ERR(res->mipi_gate)) > + return PTR_ERR(res->mipi_gate); > + } > > res->general_clk = meson_pcie_probe_clock(dev, "general", 0); > if (IS_ERR(res->general_clk)) > @@ -524,6 +554,7 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { > > static int meson_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + const struct meson_pcie_param *match_data; > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct dw_pcie *pci; > struct meson_pcie *mp; > @@ -537,6 +568,20 @@ static int meson_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pci->dev = dev; > pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops; > > + match_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > + if (!match_data) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get match data\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + mp->param = match_data; > + > + if (mp->param->has_shared_phy) { > + mp->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie"); > + if (IS_ERR(mp->phy)) { > + return PTR_ERR(mp->phy); > + } > + } > + > mp->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > if (IS_ERR(mp->reset_gpio)) { > dev_err(dev, "get reset gpio failed\n"); > @@ -555,8 +600,17 @@ static int meson_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return ret; > } > > - meson_pcie_power_on(mp); > - meson_pcie_reset(mp); > + ret = meson_pcie_power_on(mp); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "phy power on failed, %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = meson_pcie_reset(mp); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "reset failed, %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > > ret = meson_pcie_probe_clocks(mp); > if (ret) { > @@ -575,9 +629,22 @@ static int meson_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > +static struct meson_pcie_param meson_pcie_axg_param = { > + .has_shared_phy = false, > +}; > + > +static struct meson_pcie_param meson_pcie_g12a_param = { > + .has_shared_phy = true, > +}; > + > static const struct of_device_id meson_pcie_of_match[] = { > { > .compatible = "amlogic,axg-pcie", > + .data = &meson_pcie_axg_param, > + }, > + { > + .compatible = "amlogic,g12a-pcie", > + .data = &meson_pcie_g12a_param, Here, we hard-code knowledge about the SOCs regarding if they have shared phys or not. I guess the alternative would have been to assume there is a shared phy if the DT has a phandle for it. I.e. instead of mp->param->has_shared_phy everywhere you could test for mp->phy. Though I guess at least with the current approach you guard against bad DTs, this seems OK. Thanks, Andrew Murray > }, > {}, > }; > -- > 2.17.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic