From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDD4C4363C for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 04:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD98206DD for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 04:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FnfmAZ0x"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Q6ndWD7u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1CD98206DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=omX7Eu3pQLtg4mfLJwSgnp/Rnnh1oOhlomJ0WwEPYtc=; b=FnfmAZ0xzcjUonSUZI65LWA4j 89EGnR6eHpMApmUoRUDqv35d122Uxp3qaSCp0rwN/+rKkUkN/lJqHmExsoVn1MomxV+vHaER2waZ/ qpSdxtp59x45C/zcCViuEZ2RsKE1dDaBbuUlJzW8ZHzcMeDTsD2Cn+G4YxX0+1bOwyKGQmIjQ1Hjx nXbB5G65zhMKS/j13kwEBkaPjN3gd0I2sky2pmlVcvJQJq7SHaaZQKhDQxXtrkck7Av8cpUpnYaiB cMhGd/gprHL6JL2xl9BEwSFtwB84o59romfw1uYeQ2PpZXvWkO/eseoadH5uj4ifBVVhtMkSgr9Mg 1HdkH3F2Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOvVL-0000HQ-So; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 04:20:11 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOvVK-0000HF-W8; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 04:20:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=V5vx45T8BSc5RST2mUgoRPwlX1Z/KnJM+u/9/tXiNGw=; b=Q6ndWD7uAyrma5l7diY5szaMof eqz97PZxvWTQSEVQV6SURJ+YT2vOqvWWLjxqDr9Y/+To6V/9XAEz9us2N5Voyy9biXJyRc30eskGp rFISW18U1o6dz6i/OtblMkj/hZBUD5htkHnMZXoddMpH2mQqgFn2ZGVzYJrhJgEx9W4OsEeSWTsAs KyOWu4+W4kOweh7HtaSmwD6NBVf8QKfGpPiAXq4FMysQ6uFb8GBy1iFW68WwsTlrQd0PAbgmuIz5W sEvb4G69e90CoY4tdGpSr9QYQiRq47E1KMB4fbcI+a0k4IidivC3icyaX1KVZiRqcfQt+6DdWE3S5 QJIsseQg==; Received: from smtprelay0229.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.229] helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOnKM-00035J-56; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:36:21 +0000 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1A2180A7FF0; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:36:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: ship26_570a7fe271af X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3575 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <306974234222092651f7497504f8c03e1304926b.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements From: Joe Perches To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:36:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201003_203618_851388_6D992C7F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, Neil Armstrong , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , David Lechner , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Valdis =?UTF-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tools@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 12:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 15:15 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > (Adding tools and Konstantin Ryabitsev) > > > > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > > series. > > > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > > cherry-picked out of the series > > > > Is that an accurate summary? > > Exactly so, thanks. And there's no need to commit the [0/n] cover letter as a part of the merge unless the entire series was committed. Or perhaps trim the cover letter to exclude the files modified by the patch series and show only the actual files committed. And I believe b4 inserts this line ahead of the 0/n series cover letter description for the merge: Merge series "" from : Perhaps that like could be "partial merge of" when a partial merge occurs or left as is if the entire series is applied. cheers, Joe _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic