[PATCH] driver core: silence device link messages unless debugging

[PATCH] driver core: silence device link messages unless debugging

[Jerome Brunet]

On platforms making a fair use of regulators, the dev_info() messages
coming from the device link function are a bit too verbose. The amount
of message will increase further with the clock framework joining the
device link party.

These messages looks valuable for people debugging device link related
issues, so dev_dbg() looks more appropriate than dev_info().

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 04bbcd779e11..8d330f921ad7 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&link->s_node, &supplier->links.consumers);
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&link->c_node, &consumer->links.suppliers);
 
-	dev_info(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
+	dev_dbg(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
 
  out:
 	device_pm_unlock();
@@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ static void __device_link_del(struct kref *kref)
 {
 	struct device_link *link = container_of(kref, struct device_link, kref);
 
-	dev_info(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
-		 dev_name(link->supplier));
+	dev_dbg(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
+		dev_name(link->supplier));
 
 	if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)
 		pm_runtime_drop_link(link->consumer);
-- 
2.19.2


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

Re: [PATCH] driver core: silence device link messages unless debugging

[Kevin Hilman]

Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes:

> On platforms making a fair use of regulators, the dev_info() messages
> coming from the device link function are a bit too verbose. The amount
> of message will increase further with the clock framework joining the
> device link party.
>
> These messages looks valuable for people debugging device link related
> issues, so dev_dbg() looks more appropriate than dev_info().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 04bbcd779e11..8d330f921ad7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
>  	list_add_tail_rcu(&link->s_node, &supplier->links.consumers);
>  	list_add_tail_rcu(&link->c_node, &consumer->links.suppliers);
>  
> -	dev_info(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
> +	dev_dbg(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
>  
>   out:
>  	device_pm_unlock();
> @@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ static void __device_link_del(struct kref *kref)
>  {
>  	struct device_link *link = container_of(kref, struct device_link, kref);
>  
> -	dev_info(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
> -		 dev_name(link->supplier));
> +	dev_dbg(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
> +		dev_name(link->supplier));
>  
>  	if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)
>  		pm_runtime_drop_link(link->consumer);
> -- 
> 2.19.2

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

Re: [PATCH] driver core: silence device link messages unless debugging

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 5:23 PM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> On platforms making a fair use of regulators, the dev_info() messages
> coming from the device link function are a bit too verbose. The amount
> of message will increase further with the clock framework joining the
> device link party.
>
> These messages looks valuable for people debugging device link related
> issues, so dev_dbg() looks more appropriate than dev_info().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 04bbcd779e11..8d330f921ad7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
>         list_add_tail_rcu(&link->s_node, &supplier->links.consumers);
>         list_add_tail_rcu(&link->c_node, &consumer->links.suppliers);
>
> -       dev_info(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
> +       dev_dbg(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
>
>   out:
>         device_pm_unlock();
> @@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ static void __device_link_del(struct kref *kref)
>  {
>         struct device_link *link = container_of(kref, struct device_link, kref);
>
> -       dev_info(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
> -                dev_name(link->supplier));
> +       dev_dbg(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
> +               dev_name(link->supplier));
>
>         if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)
>                 pm_runtime_drop_link(link->consumer);
> --
> 2.19.2
>

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic