linux-amlogic.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Don't treat granule sizes as strict
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:57:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7himr214qe.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190812150225.25386-1-will@kernel.org>

Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> writes:

> If a CPU doesn't support the page size for which the kernel is
> configured, then we will complain and refuse to bring it online. For
> secondary CPUs (and the boot CPU on a system booting with EFI), we will
> also print an error identifying the mismatch.
>
> Consequently, the only time that the cpufeature code can detect a
> granule size mismatch is for a granule other than the one that is
> currently being used. Although we would rather such systems didn't
> exist, we've unfortunately lost that battle and Kevin reports that
> on his amlogic S922X (odroid-n2 board) we end up warning and taining
> with defconfig because 16k pages are not supported by all of the CPUs.
>
> In such a situation, we don't actually care about the feature mismatch,
> particularly now that KVM only exposes the sanitised view of the CPU
> registers. Treat the granule fields as non-strict and let Kevin run
> without a tainted kernel.
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

Thanks for the fix Will!

Kevin

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

           reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20190812150225.25386-1-will@kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7himr214qe.fsf@baylibre.com \
    --to=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).