Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: gpu: add bindings for the ARM Mali Bifrost GPU

[Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>]

On 08/04/2019 21:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:17 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Le 01/04/2019 13:24, Neil Armstrong a écrit :
>>> On 01/04/2019 12:00, Steven Price wrote:
>>>> On 01/04/2019 09:09, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Add the bindings for the Bifrost family of ARM Mali GPUs.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Bifrost GPU architecture is similar to the Midgard family,
>>>>> but with a different Shader Core & Execution Engine structures.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bindings are based on the Midgard family bindings, but the inner
>>>>> architectural changes makes it a separate family needing separate
>>>>> bindings.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Bifrost GPUs are present in a number of recent SoCs, like the
>>>>> Amlogic G12A Family, and many other vendors.
>>>>> The Amlogic vendor specific compatible is added to handle the
>>>>> specific IP integration differences and dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt         | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v3:
>>>>> - Added note about discoverable model/revision
>>>>> - Enforced fixed defined irq order
>>>>> - Fixed typo in accommodate
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>> - moved to a single compatible since HW is fully discoverable
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..711c9ead17a2
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
>>>>> +ARM Mali Bifrost GPU
>>>>> +====================
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Required properties:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- compatible :
>>>>> +  * Since Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision if fully discoverable by reading
>>>>                                              ^^
>>>> s/if/is/
>>
>> Should I still send a v5 to fixing this typo ? I can fix it while applying it.
> 
> No need to resend. I planned to apply it, but if you are going to:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 

Thanks,

Fixed and applied on drm-misc-next

Neil

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic