From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50C7C169C4 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF2A20857 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="X/zFSZwm"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="G06yJn1w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8FF2A20857 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=A2Z75TayYc9wU/3Lx99DrK/TC8pG8ocivW0kq61qenM=; b=X/zFSZwmaK0LY3 Qf6i6rCWOlpqnT4BRcwniJBwvHTndyd2cVnWEBSlJLPsiPMYTpzXdGdAo/yzoI2YZ2gpcRMlTNqqq yEPVEdwIPkXvId1t6f0tz9rzJ5NBrfdnNS3I4kJApAr7AkKp0e+g1iI6D8Gsbk5mG5RKm0ryr27Di 0H/q5LteAz8ooableer0e8UKBkEhbEf/mYEyNXQ6fVyi/2GiWy4AYscDDwSLJL6dk24uJdtWkJOBW 3UwQetJRyVBdHnB0c/cfSgZDwbod/DVbQwD/Vg+JiCvIkUuYNE8gEIdh1HddClAqDSUqEdzMAt+Cf aPW1jQTBdWGONps2xRvg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gs6f9-0001TI-4I; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:57:51 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gs6f5-0001R3-Bi for linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:57:49 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id p6so2619367lfc.1 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 05:57:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mW8qhamNDM9m+LnCLsuX8f8uOJ/Eq/Fz3JqxK7IP2ic=; b=G06yJn1w71aUJD32fkTiHf0UUBOzIHrE4Gu/+/WzhKBEm5MIWb09azIw7Zdy/iN1tk zBFYoveDXJOjICogGlCr+HbM3q7wpwXnP+L5gQ2oR1gtN0O8Oqnvylq3qF0tobHcwIbC T4AG4KHCUqFxPIY8zS8wj0fWms5UfH+p1lznjw/cDLfokdJhbdceytR4fwM+IphS/IRN 1FlKT5WSxi2JntszyTi9JoT9kzybxl0A7864jXXY/8biFhkYygNpnm9jIjtZczKy7iFm Xs/1TyF8xbIaHstfJinQQ7h+mwIC1eHlNJSOsYykGqLuDMuwBeyzqEgecUpFMJzFf4Eo aynQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mW8qhamNDM9m+LnCLsuX8f8uOJ/Eq/Fz3JqxK7IP2ic=; b=lKGmu5d8Ie9sZXnxeEm8OekPSUcMKSsSip1msG8lIgC0LLwIw0chDwXFxsZCu3SSQZ fgoo1sRP3vHYlwfd53fcGWX3Tjp3OPqQvUZUrGClxsy7zbpO56XKpgFc1JWr0W2Uwq4G m8RkAnT3DX7e9eaWZ8gqf+Yffzjw4rjXeOd2HzMK6vG7JeG58Cx8574aJ0b25aOsQ8jS bQKk3My6ZyokWYvJ21GgrDiVs8mVmCAciOkES+p5dDj+DGTZ5GbSXsU8mwQwaf1JbktK Jlqt9wYw31Srkr1hjsk4w0wZWWlVaqA6NlPJY6gEdFSk9ADG27FRwOYF9Ul9R8BfCjMp qJYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZPNxQALwDEA8Y6OJAfkOc9OZQA5IXWgT8wCIwczeocdkdm5v4X uTs95ZFmx3qw9xXn/wBANIxO4NjJG5MXCtB9bfngnYK6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaxyMA3sZoPmEh2BA6fJPJGU8OCooELrE5wmjrkXcP9D1J4xuzMFvAfh/0v2bGkv4WkIUVxI2WTqgj0nFmrn/c= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4219:: with SMTP id y25mr13455801lfh.130.1549634265412; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 05:57:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190117102315.1833-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:57:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: meson: g12a fixes To: Jerome Brunet X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190208_055747_401771_F40999C0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.69 ) X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Hilman , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:36 PM Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 14:53 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:23 AM Jerome Brunet wrote: > > > > > This patchset fixes the initial pinctrl support added for th g12a SoC > > > family, which is mainly around the register regions claimed by the > > > driver. > > > > > > Linus, would it possible for you to provide a tag with these changes to > > > Kevin ? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=ib-meson-fixes > > > > > ATM, we can only use the devices for which the pinmux is already set by > > > the bootloader. Enabling the broken pinctrl driver could cause regressions > > > in kernelCI. Having a tag, would allow us to start using pinctrl on this > > > SoC in this cycle, w/o regression. It would be nice :) > > > > When you say "this cycle" do you mean I should target fixes (v5.0-rcN) > > or next (v5.1) with these patches? > > I was referring to the 5.1 release but it is a good question, I did not really > think about 5.0. > > Those changes are mainly fixes, so guess it could go in the 5.0 but support > for this SoC is still in its early stages, so either way is fine by me. > > Whatever is simpler for you I guess ;) I already merged it for devel and other stuff on top so it will be for v5.1 as it looks now. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic