From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: silence device link messages unless debugging
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:41:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jaGwxcLf81R0eeLmoaJbUpPr9g6OzN38hWPfyX4C_6Dw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181221162341.9847-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 5:23 PM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> On platforms making a fair use of regulators, the dev_info() messages
> coming from the device link function are a bit too verbose. The amount
> of message will increase further with the clock framework joining the
> device link party.
>
> These messages looks valuable for people debugging device link related
> issues, so dev_dbg() looks more appropriate than dev_info().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 04bbcd779e11..8d330f921ad7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
> list_add_tail_rcu(&link->s_node, &supplier->links.consumers);
> list_add_tail_rcu(&link->c_node, &consumer->links.suppliers);
>
> - dev_info(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
> + dev_dbg(consumer, "Linked as a consumer to %s\n", dev_name(supplier));
>
> out:
> device_pm_unlock();
> @@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ static void __device_link_del(struct kref *kref)
> {
> struct device_link *link = container_of(kref, struct device_link, kref);
>
> - dev_info(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
> - dev_name(link->supplier));
> + dev_dbg(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
> + dev_name(link->supplier));
>
> if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)
> pm_runtime_drop_link(link->consumer);
> --
> 2.19.2
>
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-11 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-21 16:23 [PATCH] driver core: silence device link messages unless debugging Jerome Brunet
2019-01-11 0:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2019-01-11 9:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0jaGwxcLf81R0eeLmoaJbUpPr9g6OzN38hWPfyX4C_6Dw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).