From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832B1C43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E83A20657 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ujKuLEZP"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="aCdBZEWG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E83A20657 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HdC3L8Hmz0QZ8BdKBJFG6MU18MU9PS8QoMn1mdJmJI8=; b=ujKuLEZP3PITQ7 PRjlvOFOZMMGM51HMdszIbpRRVwFRjIJkHh/pocAwlMQRO3YCK8k2kdUr2EaLtcYS1Qy8sn2XopXO xRFPldYlAB0dXq5dqvhxnr58gl9hwCMJQd0EyZom4zXg6d5Br3nsDj6bV1/A2MTpv2U1Qk1ml2b0K h+hkNIXqKDGSXiwWjin94n+c1uEax0dF7HcELcLUAA9z+Pu+2OUOgXpSRRs/RaN830wcgDLzzDJNU 6aI+xMMa0FGEh0CJLw8POJXjBHD5KyjAXxES9Xl7iNbzBklytogSqvgbESzIpwPxiA06JCkb+0DR4 z4bQqTPnVaMdKC7Io/qg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gk6tQ-0002DR-P6; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:35:32 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::241]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gk6tN-0002Cd-L1 for linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:35:31 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-x241.google.com with SMTP id i6so6005858oia.6 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:35:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gQ8+BP77Osco0XH6mSksMZd8BGxrr3AZI6HfqCXrT20=; b=aCdBZEWGlWt6dUlK04jIRRZDTg2J4AxyWKpqnAzW9N8EoV/tjVdbG6z5G59pYakfKz rLANCsJFr1gLKj5JVqJa+2GQAr+xArdpR/T46ewsaMuTtu58CG3F7+kWiX6PijzOtbOG UBxnkMWqsMvSp58RED7qGgC47pmAeUr+UprMdtRh4nyrxCK7nIJvYf6u58Y/JlRwxcE4 c3/1VQWk6hmO9Hd67Yj+Z2hH59/odklEHGP++f9Hrs6jA2SCu0IuFZCGfeIp4ZBF9SdT 9V7/TiL1Ea+segpTbpiR2D6UiPu/bOaBLOILt4qrPXLGveBsb68oLiLAL0a/X2VkSxCO p3gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gQ8+BP77Osco0XH6mSksMZd8BGxrr3AZI6HfqCXrT20=; b=ecNMLkFfpuo8ANE+rfTIeqzCel4G5tm4tP4EaQ58BKlNuxawKPqMfyp7kE/ffIoLYh NQOzJj3bgfUPVQ8EEnwTcIQeYJN46KqJ+OdXWD6ASttk6rQYBTiirC4U6MAneHiA9JVS Uk85xQeetze2wurVuB7j6nIQ8X/+3avURPPmEsP3+1mQLKuZ9RJCLUegy7TabauHuo87 8FvTJvfRjQw4dkXyaMzw7MWknBLoq69AoysvZs4YSs5PVxqI2AJsJIBVoMk+A8K1+Pd6 +AAoWpuKrrAZLHXFAhAEShILDDJeKMUeFblQgEnTjFXiZGkEHanktIJvNC/3LIhTuqxO jSFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeyEr/qQftQqrlYAmaq+DAmcuiX3wf56rJjYelDsGIxRblCz/wy To0zYET0jHkIF4niIU75O0Xe9dOEhAs7gyXv2D4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN59eNhSp+1z1sKBOtkcwFczfMOqcdKEDEZxcVkYPp2ILB4nTo07+P95BnrWm9k4uhwQd9VXDPo1l4rFWkB18dM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:48d1:: with SMTP id v200mr3623641oia.69.1547728525656; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:35:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <820343bf1c43f4ca79fa33a1f1390375ebfb7e62.camel@baylibre.com> In-Reply-To: <820343bf1c43f4ca79fa33a1f1390375ebfb7e62.camel@baylibre.com> From: Andreas Fenkart Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:35:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: regression caused by: "amlogic: mmc: meson-gx: add signal resampling" To: Jerome Brunet X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190117_043529_696371_0A366732 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , krzysztof.michonski@digitalstrom.com, Kevin Hilman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Jerome > There an actual s905x p212 in kernelci which is not showing any issue, AFAIK. > > https://kernelci.org/boot/meson-gxl-s905x-p212/ > > Have a look a this recent boot of mainline/arm64: > https://storage.kernelci.org/mainline/master/v5.0-rc2-36-gfe76fc6aaf53/arm64/defconfig/lab-baylibre-seattle/boot-meson-gxl-s905x-p212.txt thanks, great way to compare with my local output messages already wondered about this: [ 1.195173] meson_vid_pll_div_recalc_rate: Invalid config value for vid_pll_div > Has the p212 is ref design of the s905x, we often see the related DT used on > other device. > > Is your board actually a p212 ? > If yes, could you tell us about any of the marking on PCB, such as the board > revision ? > If not, could you tell us more about your device ? it's a "BeeLink Mini M8 SII" pasted the output here https://pastebin.com/UCnR25mK should I try with another dtb? > We proposing this series, I flagged that this patch and the other one (on > phase settings) needed broader testing. It could possibly cause regression for > tunning and high speed modes ... this typically show with error -5 (tunning > failed) > > Here your eMMC timedout during init, so even before an attempt is made to tune > which is odd. Could you try to enable signal resampling only when going forhigh speed modes ? huh, need to look into how to do that. /Andi _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic