Re: [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device

[Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>]

On 03/16/2017 04:31 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:51:04PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>>
>> A new flag BIO_NOWAIT is introduced to identify bio's
>> orignating from iocb with IOCB_NOWAIT. This flag indicates
>> to return immediately if a request cannot be made instead
>> of retrying.
> 
> So this makes a congested block device run the bio IO completion
> callback with an -EAGAIN error present? Are all the filesystem
> direct IO submission and completion routines OK with that? i.e. does
> such a congestion case cause filesystems to temporarily expose stale
> data to unprivileged users when the IO is requeued in this way?
> 
> e.g. filesystem does allocation without blocking, submits bio,
> device is congested, runs IO completion with error, so nothing
> written to allocated blocks, write gets queued, so other read
> comes in while the write is queued, reads data from uninitialised
> blocks that were allocated during the write....
> 
> Seems kinda problematic to me to have a undocumented design
> constraint (i.e a landmine) where we submit the AIO only to have it
> error out and then expect the filesystem to do something special and
> different /without blocking/ on EAGAIN.


If the filesystems has to perform block allocation, we would return
-EAGAIN early enough. However, I agree there is a problem, since not all
filesystems know this. I worked on only three of them.

> 
> Why isn't the congestion check at a higher layer like we do for page
> cache readahead? i.e. using the bdi*congested() API at the time we
> are doing all the other filesystem blocking checks.
> 

Yes, that may work better. We will have to call bdi_read_congested() on
a write path. (will have to comment that part of the code). Would it
encompass all possible waits in the block layer?


-- 
Goldwyn