From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [Question or BUG] [NUMA]: I feel puzzled at the function cpumask_of_node Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:12:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20170608141214.GJ19866@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <5937C608.7010905@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5937C608.7010905@huawei.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel , linux-mm , linux-kernel , chenchunxiao , x86l , linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org [CC linux-api] On Wed 07-06-17 17:23:20, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > When I executed numactl -H(print cpumask_of_node for each node), I got > different result on X86 and ARM64. For each numa node, the former > only displayed online CPUs, and the latter displayed all possible > CPUs. Actually, all other ARCHs is the same to ARM64. > > So, my question is: Which case(online or possible) should function > cpumask_of_node be? Or there is no matter about it? Unfortunatelly the documentation is quite unclear What: /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpumap Date: October 2002 Contact: Linux Memory Management list Description: The node's cpumap. not really helpeful, is it? Semantically I _think_ printing online cpus makes more sense because it doesn't really make much sense to bind anything on offline nodes. Generic implementtion of cpumask_of_node indeed provides only online cpus. I haven't checked specific implementations of arch specific code but listing offline cpus sounds confusing to me. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org