From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, adam.manzanares@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 06:34:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170610053441.GD6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608073910.GB9292@infradead.org>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:39:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As already indicated this whole series looks fine to me.
>
> Al: are you going to pick this up? Or Andrew?
The main issue here is "let's bail out from ->write_iter() instances"
patch. It very obviously has holes in coverage.
Could we have FMODE_AIO_NOWAIT and make those who claim to support it
set that in ->open()? And make aio check that and bail out if asked
for nowait on a file without that flag...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-10 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 11:19 [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 01/10] fs: Separate out kiocb flags setup based on RWF_* flags Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 02/10] fs: Introduce filemap_range_has_page() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 03/10] fs: Use RWF_* flags for AIO operations Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: Introduce RWF_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
[not found] ` <20170606111939.27272-5-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-10 5:27 ` Al Viro
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 05/10] fs: return if direct write will trigger writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 06/10] fs: Introduce IOMAP_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: nowait aio support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-08 7:39 ` [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-10 5:34 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-06-12 22:38 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
[not found] ` <58bbe95e-5a4a-4387-3a00-16ed2e861bd3-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-13 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-15 11:11 ` Al Viro
2017-06-15 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170610053441.GD6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=adam.manzanares@wdc.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).