From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over
 symlinks
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:29:06 +1100
Message-ID: <20200115142906.saagd2lse7i7njux@yavin>
References: <20200101144407.ugjwzk7zxrucaa6a@yavin.dot.cyphar.com>
 <20200101234009.GB8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20200102035920.dsycgxnb6ba2jhz2@yavin.dot.cyphar.com>
 <20200103014901.GC8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20200108031314.GE8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CAHk-=wgQ3yOBuK8mxpnntD8cfX-+10ba81f86BYg8MhvwpvOMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200110210719.ktg3l2kwjrdutlh6@yavin>
 <20200114045733.GW8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20200114200150.ryld4npoblns2ybe@yavin>
 <20200115142517.GI8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jicj4wr2fyynqqnx"
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200115142517.GI8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>, dev@opencontainers.org, Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org


--jicj4wr2fyynqqnx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2020-01-15, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:01:50AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
>=20
> > Yes, there were two patches I sent a while ago[1]. I can re-send them if
> > you like. The second patch switches open_how->mode to a u64, but I'm
> > still on the fence about whether that makes sense to do...
>=20
> IMO plain __u64 is better than games with __aligned_u64 - all sizes are
> fixed, so...
>=20
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191219105533.12508-1-cyphar@cyphar.=
com/
>=20
> Do you want that series folded into "open: introduce openat2(2) syscall"
> and "selftests: add openat2(2) selftests" or would you rather have them
> appended at the end of the series.  Personally I'd go for "fold them in"
> if it had been about my code, but it's really up to you.

"fold them in" would probably be better to avoid making the mainline
history confusing afterwards. Thanks.

--=20
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

--jicj4wr2fyynqqnx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQSxZm6dtfE8gxLLfYqdlLljIbnQEgUCXh8hrwAKCRCdlLljIbnQ
Eg7QAP91xggZVGKm7aFrAM05CS20D+mj/0AuHhgnu+nz3X+6qwD9FPEQyNWth7f6
RpocX3ojVl40GZTohTHSOJag04kTbAQ=
=WA+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jicj4wr2fyynqqnx--