From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
luto@kernel.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
ddutile@redhat.com, dhildenb@redhat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
mhocko@suse.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
wei.w.wang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 4/8] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 22:29:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220915142913.2213336-5-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915142913.2213336-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
Currently in mmu_notifier validate path, hva range is recorded and then
checked against in the mmu_notifier_retry_hva() of the page fault path.
However, for the to be introduced private memory, a page fault may not
have a hva associated, checking gfn(gpa) makes more sense.
For existing non private memory case, gfn is expected to continue to
work. The only downside is when aliasing multiple gfns to a single hva,
the current algorithm of checking multiple ranges could result in a much
larger range being rejected. Such aliasing should be uncommon, so the
impact is expected small.
The patch also fixes a bug in kvm_zap_gfn_range() which has already
been using gfn when calling kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin/end() while these
functions accept hva in current code.
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 18 +++++++---------
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index e418ef3ecfcb..08abad4f3e6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4203,7 +4203,7 @@ static bool is_page_fault_stale(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
return fault->slot &&
- mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(vcpu->kvm, mmu_seq, fault->hva);
+ mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(vcpu->kvm, mmu_seq, fault->gfn);
}
static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index eac1787b899b..2125b50f6345 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -776,8 +776,8 @@ struct kvm {
struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
unsigned long mmu_invalidate_seq;
long mmu_invalidate_in_progress;
- unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_start;
- unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_end;
+ gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_start;
+ gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_end;
#endif
struct list_head devices;
u64 manual_dirty_log_protect;
@@ -1366,10 +1366,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
void *kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
#endif
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
@@ -1938,9 +1936,9 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mmu_seq)
return 0;
}
-static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
+static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
unsigned long mmu_seq,
- unsigned long hva)
+ gfn_t gfn)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
@@ -1950,8 +1948,8 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
* positives, due to shortcuts when handing concurrent invalidations.
*/
if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress) &&
- hva >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
- hva < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
+ gfn >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
+ gfn < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
return 1;
if (kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq != mmu_seq)
return 1;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 12dc0dc57b06..fa9dd2d2c001 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -540,8 +540,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
typedef bool (*hva_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
-typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
+typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
typedef void (*on_unlock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
@@ -628,7 +627,8 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
locked = true;
KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock))
- range->on_lock(kvm, range->start, range->end);
+ range->on_lock(kvm, gfn_range.start,
+ gfn_range.end);
if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))
break;
}
@@ -715,15 +715,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
kvm_handle_hva_range(mn, address, address + 1, pte, kvm_set_spte_gfn);
}
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end)
+static inline void update_invalidate_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start,
+ gfn_t end)
{
- /*
- * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
- * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
- * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
- */
- kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress++;
if (likely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress == 1)) {
kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start = start;
kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end = end;
@@ -744,6 +738,28 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
}
}
+static void mark_invalidate_in_progress(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+ /*
+ * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
+ * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
+ * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
+ */
+ kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress++;
+}
+
+static bool kvm_mmu_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+ update_invalidate_range(kvm, range->start, range->end);
+ return kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
+}
+
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+ mark_invalidate_in_progress(kvm, start, end);
+ update_invalidate_range(kvm, start, end);
+}
+
static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
{
@@ -752,8 +768,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
.start = range->start,
.end = range->end,
.pte = __pte(0),
- .handler = kvm_unmap_gfn_range,
- .on_lock = kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin,
+ .handler = kvm_mmu_handle_gfn_range,
+ .on_lock = mark_invalidate_in_progress,
.on_unlock = kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed,
.flush_on_ret = true,
.may_block = mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range),
@@ -791,8 +807,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
return 0;
}
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end)
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
{
/*
* This sequence increase will notify the kvm page fault that
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-15 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 14:29 [PATCH v8 0/8] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM Chao Peng
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] mm/memfd: Introduce userspace inaccessible memfd Chao Peng
2022-09-19 9:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-19 19:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 21:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-09-22 13:23 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-09-23 15:20 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-23 15:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-26 14:23 ` Chao Peng
2022-09-26 15:51 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-27 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-30 16:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-13 13:34 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-17 10:31 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-17 14:58 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-17 19:05 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-19 13:30 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-18 0:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 15:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-23 0:58 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-09-26 10:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-26 14:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-26 14:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-27 23:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 13:36 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-22 13:26 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-09-22 19:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-23 0:53 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-09-23 15:20 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-30 16:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-30 16:23 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-10-03 7:33 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-03 11:01 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-04 15:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-06 8:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-06 13:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-17 13:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-17 16:19 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-10-17 16:39 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-10-17 21:56 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-10-18 13:42 ` Vishal Annapurve
2022-10-19 15:32 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-10-20 10:50 ` Vishal Annapurve
2022-10-21 13:54 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-21 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 12:23 ` Vishal Annapurve
2022-10-21 13:47 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-21 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-24 14:59 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2022-10-24 15:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-03 16:27 ` Vishal Annapurve
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] KVM: Extend the memslot to support fd-based private memory Chao Peng
2022-09-16 9:14 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-09-16 9:53 ` Chao Peng
2022-09-26 10:26 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-26 14:04 ` Chao Peng
2022-09-29 22:45 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-29 23:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-05 13:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-05 22:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-06 9:00 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-06 14:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-06 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-06 15:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-07 11:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-07 14:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-07 21:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-08 16:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-08 17:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-10 8:25 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-12 8:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit Chao Peng
2022-09-16 9:17 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-09-16 9:54 ` Chao Peng
2022-09-15 14:29 ` Chao Peng [this message]
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] KVM: Register/unregister the guest private memory regions Chao Peng
2022-09-26 10:36 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-26 14:07 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-11 9:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-12 2:35 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-17 10:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-17 22:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 13:23 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-19 15:02 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-19 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 18:32 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] KVM: Update lpage info when private/shared memory are mixed Chao Peng
2022-09-29 16:52 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-30 8:59 ` Chao Peng
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] KVM: Handle page fault for private memory Chao Peng
2022-10-14 18:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 14:48 ` Chao Peng
2022-09-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] KVM: Enable and expose KVM_MEM_PRIVATE Chao Peng
2022-10-04 14:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-10-10 8:31 ` Chao Peng
2022-10-06 8:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-10-10 8:33 ` Chao Peng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220915142913.2213336-5-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--to=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).