archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <>
To: David Howells <>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Alexander Viro <>,
	linux-fsdevel <>,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] afs: Add metadata xattrs
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:27:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1844 bytes --]

On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:14 AM, David Howells <> wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <> wrote:
>> NAK.  Don't overload xattrs with magic behavior just to avoid the need
>> to do proper syscalls or ioctls.
> How?  This has to work on non-files, files you can't open and mountpoints.
> You can't do an ioctl() on a file opened O_PATH:
> 	if (unlikely(f->f_flags & O_PATH)) {
> 		f->f_mode = FMODE_PATH;
> 		f->f_op = &empty_fops;
> 		return 0;
> 	}
> and you can't specify AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT or AT_NO_FOLLOW to openat(), so ioctl()
> is of no use here.
> Do you advocate introducing a pioctl() call?  Linus was dead-set against that
> as I recall.
> I could invent a bunch of AFS-specific syscalls, but I'd rather not do that or
> I suppose bring my fsinfo() patches up to scratch - but you didn't like those
> either.
> Note that using xattrs for fs info is not without precedent in Linux - cifs,
> for example.

IMHO, xattrs are a fairly reasonable interface for accessing filesystem-specific
attributes of a file that do not have generic equivalents on other filesystems.
I can't see there being much value to having AFS-specific syscalls, and xattrs
also are more easily accessed by generic userspace tools than ioctl() calls.

There is also the general negative opinion among kernel developers to adding new
ioctls in the first place that means there are few options for how to get
non-standard information.

I could imagine that "fid" (file identifier that is larger than 64-bit inode) is
common enough that it could be added to statx(). I think at least "volume" (maybe
as "label") and "cell" (maybe == "server" or "fsname"?) could be generic part of
fsinfo if there was some willingness to accept that interface upstream.

Cheers, Andreas

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-06 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <>
     [not found] ` <>
2017-07-06 15:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-07-06 16:14   ` David Howells
2017-07-06 18:27     ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2017-07-08 19:44       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-09  1:01         ` Theodore Ts'o
     [not found]           ` <>
2017-07-09  2:37             ` Jeffrey Altman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] afs: Add metadata xattrs' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).