From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 03/12] LRNG - /proc interface Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 08:39:40 -0800 Message-ID: <4EB89769-7A2C-4A03-A832-9A0539DD3336@amacapital.net> References: <2476454.l8LQlgn7Hv@positron.chronox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2476454.l8LQlgn7Hv@positron.chronox.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Stephan_M=C3=BCller?= Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , "Alexander E. Patrakov" , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Willy Tarreau , Matthew Garrett , Vito Caputo , Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Ray Strode , William Jon McCann , zhangjs , Andy Lutomirski , Florian Weimer , Lennart Poettering , Nicolai Stange List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org > On Nov 16, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Stephan M=C3=BCller wro= te: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFThe LRNG /proc interface provides the same files as the legacy > /dev/random. These files behave identically. Yet, all files are > documented at [1]. Why?