linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	chenchunxiao
	<chenchunxiao-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	x86l <x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Question or BUG] [NUMA]: I feel puzzled at the function cpumask_of_node
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:00:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5941EA39.8090501@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608141214.GJ19866-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>



On 2017/6/8 22:12, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [CC linux-api]
> 
> On Wed 07-06-17 17:23:20, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>> When I executed numactl -H(print cpumask_of_node for each node), I got
>> different result on X86 and ARM64.  For each numa node, the former
>> only displayed online CPUs, and the latter displayed all possible
>> CPUs.  Actually, all other ARCHs is the same to ARM64.
>>
>> So, my question is: Which case(online or possible) should function
>> cpumask_of_node be? Or there is no matter about it?
> 
> Unfortunatelly the documentation is quite unclear
> What:		/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpumap
> Date:		October 2002
> Contact:	Linux Memory Management list <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> Description:
> 		The node's cpumap.
> 
> not really helpeful, is it? Semantically I _think_ printing online cpus
> makes more sense because it doesn't really make much sense to bind
> anything on offline nodes. Generic implementtion of cpumask_of_node
> indeed provides only online cpus. I haven't checked specific
> implementations of arch specific code but listing offline cpus sounds
> confusing to me.
> 
OK, thank you very much. So, how about we directly add "cpumask_and with cpu_online_mask", as below:

diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index b10479c..199723d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ static struct bus_type node_subsys = {
 static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct device *dev, bool list, char *buf)
 {
        struct node *node_dev = to_node(dev);
-   const struct cpumask *mask = cpumask_of_node(node_dev->dev.id);
+ struct cpumask mask;
+
+ cpumask_and(&mask, cpumask_of_node(node_dev->dev.id), cpu_online_mask);

        /* 2008/04/07: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need 9 chars per 32 bits. */
        BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS/32 * 9) > (PAGE_SIZE-1));

-   return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, mask);
+ return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, &mask);
 }

 static inline ssize_t node_read_cpumask(struct device *dev,


-- 
Thanks!
BestRegards

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-15  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5937C608.7010905@huawei.com>
2017-06-08 14:12 ` [Question or BUG] [NUMA]: I feel puzzled at the function cpumask_of_node Michal Hocko
     [not found]   ` <20170608141214.GJ19866-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-15  2:00     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5941EA39.8090501@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chenchunxiao-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).