From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Stanley Subject: Re: [patch v14 2/4] drivers: jtag: Add Aspeed SoC 24xx and 25xx families JTAG master driver Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:04:26 +1030 Message-ID: References: <1513268971-13518-1-git-send-email-oleksandrs@mellanox.com> <1513268971-13518-3-git-send-email-oleksandrs@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1513268971-13518-3-git-send-email-oleksandrs-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Oleksandr Shamray Cc: Greg KH , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM , devicetree , OpenBMC Maillist , =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIFDDrXJrbw==?= , Tobias Klauser , linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Vadim Pasternak , system-sw-low-level-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , openocd-devel-owner-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "David S . Miller" , mchehab-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Jiri Pirko List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Oleksandr Shamray wrote: > Driver adds support of Aspeed 2500/2400 series SOC JTAG master controller. Looks good. I have a few small things below, but I am happy to see this merged from my point of view as ASPEED maintainer. Cheers, Joel > + > +menuconfig JTAG_ASPEED > + tristate "Aspeed SoC JTAG controller support" > + depends on JTAG && HAS_IOMEM Add ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST > + ---help--- > + This provides a support for Aspeed JTAG device, equipped on > + Aspeed SoC 24xx and 25xx families. Drivers allows programming > + of hardware devices, connected to SoC through the JTAG interface. > + > + If you want this support, you should say Y here. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will > + be called jtag-aspeed. > diff --git a/drivers/jtag/Makefile b/drivers/jtag/Makefile > index af37493..04a855e 100644 > --- a/drivers/jtag/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/jtag/Makefile > @@ -1 +1,2 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_JTAG) += jtag.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_JTAG_ASPEED) += jtag-aspeed.o > diff --git a/drivers/jtag/jtag-aspeed.c b/drivers/jtag/jtag-aspeed.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..99277d2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/jtag/jtag-aspeed.c > @@ -0,0 +1,783 @@ > +static int aspeed_jtag_xfer(struct jtag *jtag, struct jtag_xfer *xfer, > + u8 *xfer_data) > +{ > + static const u8 sm_update_shiftir[] = {1, 1, 0, 0}; > + static const u8 sm_update_shiftdr[] = {1, 0, 0}; > + static const u8 sm_pause_idle[] = {1, 1, 0}; > + static const u8 sm_pause_update[] = {1, 1}; > + struct aspeed_jtag *aspeed_jtag = jtag_priv(jtag); > + unsigned long *data = (unsigned long *)xfer_data; > + unsigned long remain_xfer = xfer->length; > + unsigned long offset; > + char dbg_str[256]; > + int pos = 0; > + int i; > + > + for (offset = 0, i = 0; offset < xfer->length; > + offset += ASPEED_JTAG_DATA_CHUNK_SIZE, i++) { It looks like offset is unused. > + pos += snprintf(&dbg_str[pos], sizeof(dbg_str) - pos, > + "0x%08lx ", data[i]); > + } > + > + dev_dbg(aspeed_jtag->dev, "aspeed_jtag %s %s xfer, mode:%s, END:%d, len:%lu, TDI[%s]\n", > + xfer->type == JTAG_SIR_XFER ? "SIR" : "SDR", > + xfer->direction == JTAG_READ_XFER ? "READ" : "WRITE", > + aspeed_jtag->mode & JTAG_XFER_HW_MODE ? "HW" : "SW", > + xfer->endstate, remain_xfer, dbg_str); > + > + if (!(aspeed_jtag->mode & JTAG_XFER_HW_MODE)) { > + /* SW mode */ > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, ASPEED_JTAG_SW_MODE_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_SW_MODE_TDIO, ASPEED_JTAG_SW); > + > + if (aspeed_jtag->status != JTAG_STATE_IDLE) { > + /*IR/DR Pause->Exit2 IR / DR->Update IR /DR */ > + aspeed_jtag_sm_cycle(aspeed_jtag, sm_pause_update, > + sizeof(sm_pause_update)); > + } > + > + if (xfer->type == JTAG_SIR_XFER) > + /* ->IRSCan->CapIR->ShiftIR */ > + aspeed_jtag_sm_cycle(aspeed_jtag, sm_update_shiftir, > + sizeof(sm_update_shiftir)); > + else > + /* ->DRScan->DRCap->DRShift */ > + aspeed_jtag_sm_cycle(aspeed_jtag, sm_update_shiftdr, > + sizeof(sm_update_shiftdr)); > + > + aspeed_jtag_xfer_sw(aspeed_jtag, xfer, data); > + > + /* DIPause/DRPause */ > + aspeed_jtag_tck_cycle(aspeed_jtag, 0, 0); > + > + if (xfer->endstate == JTAG_STATE_IDLE) { > + /* ->DRExit2->DRUpdate->IDLE */ > + aspeed_jtag_sm_cycle(aspeed_jtag, sm_pause_idle, > + sizeof(sm_pause_idle)); > + } > + } else { > + /* hw mode */ > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, 0, ASPEED_JTAG_SW); > + aspeed_jtag_xfer_hw(aspeed_jtag, xfer, data); > + } > + > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, ASPEED_JTAG_SW_MODE_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_SW_MODE_TDIO, ASPEED_JTAG_SW); > + aspeed_jtag->status = xfer->endstate; > + return 0; > +} > > + > +static irqreturn_t aspeed_jtag_interrupt(s32 this_irq, void *dev_id) > +{ > + struct aspeed_jtag *aspeed_jtag = dev_id; > + irqreturn_t ret; > + u32 status; > + > + status = aspeed_jtag_read(aspeed_jtag, ASPEED_JTAG_ISR); > + dev_dbg(aspeed_jtag->dev, "status %x\n", status); > + > + if (status & ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INT_MASK) { > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, > + (status & ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INT_MASK) > + | (status & ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INT_EN_MASK), > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR); > + aspeed_jtag->flag |= status & ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INT_MASK; > + } > + > + if (aspeed_jtag->flag) { > + wake_up_interruptible(&aspeed_jtag->jtag_wq); > + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > + } else { > + dev_err(aspeed_jtag->dev, "aspeed_jtag irq status:%x\n", using dev_err will give you sensible prefixes for any messages that print out. You could remove "aspeed_jtag" from this any any other prints you have. > + status); > + ret = IRQ_NONE; > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +int aspeed_jtag_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct aspeed_jtag *aspeed_jtag) > +{ > + struct resource *res; > + int err; > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + aspeed_jtag->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(aspeed_jtag->dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(aspeed_jtag->reg_base)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + aspeed_jtag->pclk = devm_clk_get(aspeed_jtag->dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(aspeed_jtag->pclk)) { > + dev_err(aspeed_jtag->dev, "devm_clk_get failed\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(aspeed_jtag->pclk); > + } > + > + clk_prepare_enable(aspeed_jtag->pclk); Can you move this below the platform_get_irq? that way you can return an error if the getting the IRQ fails, without having to clean up the clock. > + > + aspeed_jtag->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + if (aspeed_jtag->irq < 0) { > + dev_err(aspeed_jtag->dev, "no irq specified\n"); > + err = -ENOENT; > + goto clk_unprep; > + } > + > + /* Enable clock */ > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, ASPEED_JTAG_CTL_ENG_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_CTL_ENG_OUT_EN, ASPEED_JTAG_CTRL); > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, ASPEED_JTAG_SW_MODE_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_SW_MODE_TDIO, ASPEED_JTAG_SW); > + > + err = devm_request_irq(aspeed_jtag->dev, aspeed_jtag->irq, > + aspeed_jtag_interrupt, 0, > + "aspeed-jtag", aspeed_jtag); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(aspeed_jtag->dev, "aspeed_jtag unable to get IRQ"); > + goto clk_unprep; > + } > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "aspeed_jtag:IRQ %d.\n", aspeed_jtag->irq); Again, remove the aspeed_jtag prefix. > + > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INST_PAUSE | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INST_COMPLETE | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_DATA_PAUSE | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_DATA_COMPLETE | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INST_PAUSE_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_INST_COMPLETE_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_DATA_PAUSE_EN | > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR_DATA_COMPLETE_EN, > + ASPEED_JTAG_ISR); > + > + aspeed_jtag->flag = 0; > + aspeed_jtag->mode = 0; > + init_waitqueue_head(&aspeed_jtag->jtag_wq); > + return 0; > + > +clk_unprep: > + clk_disable_unprepare(aspeed_jtag->pclk); > + return err; > +} > + > +int aspeed_jtag_deinit(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct aspeed_jtag *aspeed_jtag) > +{ > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, 0, ASPEED_JTAG_ISR); > + /* Disable clock */ > + aspeed_jtag_write(aspeed_jtag, 0, ASPEED_JTAG_CTRL); > + clk_disable_unprepare(aspeed_jtag->pclk); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct jtag_ops aspeed_jtag_ops = { > + .freq_get = aspeed_jtag_freq_get, > + .freq_set = aspeed_jtag_freq_set, > + .status_get = aspeed_jtag_status_get, > + .idle = aspeed_jtag_idle, > + .xfer = aspeed_jtag_xfer, > + .mode_set = aspeed_jtag_mode_set > +}; > + > +static int aspeed_jtag_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct aspeed_jtag *aspeed_jtag; > + struct device *dev; > + struct jtag *jtag; > + int err; > + > + dev = &pdev->dev; > + if (!of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, > + "aspeed,ast2500-jtag") && > + !of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, > + "aspeed,ast2400-jtag")) > + return -ENODEV; Given the Aspeed device only ever probes with device tree, can you drop these redundant checks? > + > + jtag = jtag_alloc(sizeof(*aspeed_jtag), &aspeed_jtag_ops); > + if (!jtag) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, jtag); > + aspeed_jtag = jtag_priv(jtag); > + aspeed_jtag->dev = &pdev->dev; > + > + /* Initialize device*/ > + err = aspeed_jtag_init(pdev, aspeed_jtag); > + if (err) > + goto err_jtag_init; > + > + /* Initialize JTAG core structure*/ > + err = jtag_register(jtag); > + if (err) > + goto err_jtag_register; > + > + return 0; > + > +err_jtag_register: > + aspeed_jtag_deinit(pdev, aspeed_jtag); > +err_jtag_init: > + jtag_free(jtag); > + return err; > +} > + > +static int aspeed_jtag_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct jtag *jtag; > + > + jtag = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + aspeed_jtag_deinit(pdev, jtag_priv(jtag)); > + jtag_unregister(jtag); > + jtag_free(jtag); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_jtag_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-jtag", }, > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-jtag", }, > + {} > +}; > + > +static struct platform_driver aspeed_jtag_driver = { > + .probe = aspeed_jtag_probe, > + .remove = aspeed_jtag_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = ASPEED_JTAG_NAME, > + .of_match_table = aspeed_jtag_of_match, > + }, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(aspeed_jtag_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Oleksandr Shamray "); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ASPEED JTAG driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 1.7.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html