linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	kernel-hardening-ZwoEplunGu1jrUoiu81ncdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
	LSM List
	<linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Dongsu Park <dpark-VwIFZPTo/vqsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>,
	James Morris
	<james.l.morris-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul-r2n+y4ga6xFZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa
	<penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
	<acme-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab
	<mchehab-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kern>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] modules:capabilities: add a per-task modules autoload restriction
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:16:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEiveUevPA=b5ooDBAvbVBGoWR4COaMsLK-zLMZiY43BcbJ+UQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k266hacq.fsf-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Djalal Harouni <tixxdz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Djalal Harouni <tixxdz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>> When value is (1), task must have CAP_SYS_MODULE to be able to trigger a
>>>> module auto-load operation, or CAP_NET_ADMIN for modules with a
>>>> 'netdev-%s' alias.
>>>
>>> Sorry, the magic 'netdev-' prefix is a crawling horror.  To do this
>>
>> Yes I agree, that's the not the best part. I added it for backward
>> compatibility since I did notice that some network daemon retain
>> CAP_NET_ADMIN for this case. The aim of the patches is to get modules
>> autoload covered with CAP_SYS_MODULE and make it more like explicit
>> modules loading.
>>
>>> properly, you need to hand the capability (if any) from the
>>> request_module() call.  Probably by adding a new request_module_cap and
>>> making request_module() call that, then fixing up the callers.
>>
>> Hmm, sorry Rusty I'm a bit confused, when you refer to "callers", you
>> mean request_module() callers ?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, I'm not sure that the best thing here since it may defeat the
>> purpose of this feature if we allow to pass capabilities.
>>
>> Right now we have modules autoload that can be triggered without
>> privileges, or with CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_MODULE...
>> and some caps may allow to load other modules to resolve symbols etc.
>>
>> The public exploits did target CAP_NET_ADMIN, if we offer a way to
>> pass in capabilities it will be used it as it is the case now without
>> it, not to mention that some capabilities are overloaded, exploits
>> will continue for these ones.
>>
>> The goal is to narrow modules autoload only to CAP_SYS_MODULE or
>> disable it completely for process trees. Later you can give
>> CAP_SYS_MODULE and you are sure that only /lib/modules/ will be
>> autoloaded, no arbitrary loads by using seccomp filter on module
>> syscalls, or separate the process in two one with CAP_SYS_MODULE and
>> the other with its own capabilities and feature use.
>>
>> I also don't like that 'netdev-%s' but it is for compatibility for
>> specific cases, maybe there are others that we may have to add. But I
>> would prefer if we narrow it down to only CAP_SYS_MODULE.
>
> There's one place where this is called, net/core/dev_ioctl.c:
>
>         if (no_module && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
>                 no_module = request_module("netdev-%s", name);
>
> *That's the place* you want to add the exception, and the cleanest way
> is probably to add another arg to __request_module:

Ok I see. I guess we have to add comments that this is for netdev
only, and other parts should continue to go with standard
request_module().


> (incomplete patch, but you get the idea):
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kmod.h b/include/linux/kmod.h
> index c4e441e00db5..2ea82d5d20af 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kmod.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kmod.h
> @@ -33,15 +33,16 @@ extern char modprobe_path[]; /* for sysctl */
>  /* modprobe exit status on success, -ve on error.  Return value
>   * usually useless though. */
>  extern __printf(2, 3)
> -int __request_module(bool wait, const char *name, ...);
> -#define request_module(mod...) __request_module(true, mod)
> -#define request_module_nowait(mod...) __request_module(false, mod)
> -#define try_then_request_module(x, mod...) \
> -       ((x) ?: (__request_module(true, mod), (x)))
> +int __request_module(bool wait, int allow_cap, const char *name, ...);
>  #else
> -static inline int request_module(const char *name, ...) { return -ENOSYS; }
> -static inline int request_module_nowait(const char *name, ...) { return -ENOSYS; }
> -#define try_then_request_module(x, mod...) (x)
> +static inline __printf(2,3)
> +int __request_module(bool wait, int allow_cap, const char *name, ...)
> +{ return -ENOSYS; }
> +#endif
> +#define request_module(mod...) __request_module(true, -1, mod)
> +#define request_module_nowait(mod...) __request_module(false, -1, mod)
> +#define try_then_request_module(x, mod...) \
> +       ((x) ?: (__request_module(true, -1, mod), (x)))
>  #endif
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 96899fad7016..9f1217c7cb23 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -889,9 +890,9 @@ static inline int security_kernel_create_files_as(struct cred *cred,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static inline int security_kernel_module_request(char *kmod_name)
> +static inline int security_kernel_module_request(char *kmod_name, int allow_cap)
>  {
> -       return 0;
> +       return cap_kernel_module_request(kmod_name, allow_cap);
>  }
>
>  static inline int security_kernel_read_file(struct file *file,
> diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
> index 563f97e2be36..b2d2f525c80b 100644
> --- a/kernel/kmod.c
> +++ b/kernel/kmod.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static int call_modprobe(char *module_name, int wait)
>  /**
>   * __request_module - try to load a kernel module
>   * @wait: wait (or not) for the operation to complete
> + * @allow_cap: if positive, always allow modprobe if this capability set.

Alright! and just to make sure that this will be true only if the
sysctl "modules_autoload_mode" or "task->modules_autoload_mode" are
not in 'disabled' mode. If disabled, then capability is ignored and
modules autoload is disabled for all or for the related process tree.
Ok I have to document that.



>   * @fmt: printf style format string for the name of the module
>   * @...: arguments as specified in the format string
>   *
> @@ -123,7 +124,8 @@ static int call_modprobe(char *module_name, int wait)
>   * If module auto-loading support is disabled then this function
>   * becomes a no-operation.
>   */
> -int __request_module(bool wait, const char *fmt, ...)
> +
> +int __request_module(bool wait, int allow_cap, const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
>         va_list args;
>         char module_name[MODULE_NAME_LEN];
> @@ -150,7 +152,7 @@ int __request_module(bool wait, const char *fmt, ...)
>         if (ret >= MODULE_NAME_LEN)
>                 return -ENAMETOOLONG;
>
> -       ret = security_kernel_module_request(module_name);
> +       ret = security_kernel_module_request(module_name, allow_cap);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev_ioctl.c b/net/core/dev_ioctl.c
> index b94b1d293506..e7a7dc28761d 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev_ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev_ioctl.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,8 @@ void dev_load(struct net *net, const char *name)
>
>         no_module = !dev;
>         if (no_module && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> -               no_module = request_module("netdev-%s", name);
> +               no_module = __request_module(true, CAP_NET_ADMIN,
> +                                            "netdev-%s", name);
>         if (no_module && capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE))
>                 request_module("%s", name);
>  }
>
> Hope that helps,

Indeed. Thank you!

So I'll wait for more feedback maybe other maintainers want to comment
on this bit, I'll re-send after the merge window.


> Rusty.

Thanks!


-- 
tixxdz

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-27 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-19 22:20 [PATCH v3 0/2] modules:capabilities: automatic module loading restrictions Djalal Harouni
2017-04-19 22:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] modules:capabilities: automatic module loading restriction Djalal Harouni
2017-04-19 23:16   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-20  2:22   ` Ben Hutchings
2017-04-20 12:44     ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2017-04-20 15:02       ` Ben Hutchings
     [not found]         ` <1492700543.31767.23.camel-/+tVBieCtBitmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20 20:39           ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
     [not found]             ` <CAEiveUdFL53XyQpacmN6f8F28M0bLQDcetpRXJjrJ10vDmQi8Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20 21:28               ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 22:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] modules:capabilities: add a per-task modules autoload restriction Djalal Harouni
2017-04-19 23:15   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-19 23:43     ` Kees Cook
2017-04-20  2:41       ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found]         ` <CALCETrUueOx1tqj+Ru93KGpy2HHR-A_GQ6DrAppiomkPTtX7Lw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-21 23:19           ` Kees Cook
2017-04-21 23:28             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-21 23:40               ` Kees Cook
2017-04-21 23:51                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-22  0:12                   ` Djalal Harouni
     [not found]                     ` <CAEiveUcx8fwQgXdLPeMNsTjX2KPhQKH__a-XzcHko_1aCmh4sg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-22  1:19                       ` Djalal Harouni
2017-04-22  6:51                       ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found]                         ` <CALCETrUT73CcPQx2T=1zWbOUhw9r-c_YqXw5-KTwxgWPgXuTwA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-22 19:29                           ` Kees Cook
     [not found]                             ` <CAGXu5jLV+WZyj+xnxVFkFEgEthNt6eXdcSgHT-=85mJ1ECZ1Rw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-24 14:25                               ` Djalal Harouni
2017-04-24 18:02                                 ` Kees Cook
     [not found]                                   ` <CAGXu5jL_-cxidy_O4ORaN0iX9o7=hsi3DYTRvQs5w5363Z+MVg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-24 18:35                                     ` Djalal Harouni
2017-04-21 23:52               ` Casey Schaufler
2017-04-22  0:00                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-22  0:13                   ` Casey Schaufler
2017-04-22  6:45                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-22 12:17               ` Djalal Harouni
     [not found]                 ` <CAEiveUdbQcfn1xC5xWMv91vL_uR1MGTvARqw-E4GDTMUZ6t=bA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-04 13:07                   ` Djalal Harouni
2017-05-04 14:58                     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-05-05 13:06                       ` Djalal Harouni
2017-05-05 16:18                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-04-20  1:57   ` kbuild test robot
     [not found]   ` <1492640420-27345-3-git-send-email-tixxdz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 22:38     ` Djalal Harouni
2017-04-24  4:29     ` Rusty Russell
2017-04-26  9:06       ` Djalal Harouni
2017-04-27  2:07         ` Rusty Russell
     [not found]           ` <87k266hacq.fsf-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-27 13:16             ` Djalal Harouni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEiveUevPA=b5ooDBAvbVBGoWR4COaMsLK-zLMZiY43BcbJ+UQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tixxdz-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acme-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dpark-VwIFZPTo/vqsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=james.l.morris-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jeyu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening-ZwoEplunGu1jrUoiu81ncdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mchehab-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo@kern \
    --cc=paul-r2n+y4ga6xFZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).