linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
	<acme-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>,
	David Drysdale <drysdale-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"David S . Miller"
	<davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	"Eric W . Biederman"
	<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	James Morris
	<james.l.morris-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Jann Horn <jann-XZ1E9jl8jIdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk
	<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul-r2n+y4ga6xFZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>,
	Sargun Dhillon <sargun-GaZTRHToo+CzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn"
	<serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Drewry <wa>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] landlock: Add LSM hooks related to filesystem
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:17:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJKNp8R5kZ1U=K7KwgnV=NvH5aoAbftA-05a_Sa4pOg1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170328234650.19695-5-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Handle 33 filesystem-related LSM hooks for the Landlock filesystem
> event: LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS.
>
> A Landlock event wrap LSM hooks for similar kernel object types (e.g.
> struct file, struct path...). Multiple LSM hooks can trigger the same
> Landlock event.
>
> Landlock handle nine coarse-grained actions: read, write, execute, new,
> get, remove, ioctl, lock and fcntl. Each of them abstract LSM hook
> access control in a way that can be extended in the future.
>
> The Landlock LSM hook registration is done after other LSM to only run
> actions from user-space, via eBPF programs, if the access was granted by
> major (privileged) LSMs.
>
> Changes since v5:
> * split hooks.[ch] into hooks.[ch] and hooks_fs.[ch]
> * add more documentation
> * cosmetic fixes
>
> Changes since v4:
> * add LSM hook abstraction called Landlock event
>   * use the compiler type checking to verify hooks use by an event
>   * handle all filesystem related LSM hooks (e.g. file_permission,
>     mmap_file, sb_mount...)
> * register BPF programs for Landlock just after LSM hooks registration
> * move hooks registration after other LSMs
> * add failsafes to check if a hook is not used by the kernel
> * allow partial raw value access form the context (needed for programs
>   generated by LLVM)
>
> Changes since v3:
> * split commit
> * add hooks dealing with struct inode and struct path pointers:
>   inode_permission and inode_getattr
> * add abstraction over eBPF helper arguments thanks to wrapping structs
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h    |   5 +
>  security/landlock/Makefile   |   4 +-
>  security/landlock/hooks.c    | 115 +++++++++
>  security/landlock/hooks.h    | 177 ++++++++++++++
>  security/landlock/hooks_fs.c | 563 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  security/landlock/hooks_fs.h |  19 ++
>  security/landlock/init.c     |  13 +
>  security/security.c          |   7 +-
>  8 files changed, 901 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 security/landlock/hooks.c
>  create mode 100644 security/landlock/hooks.h
>  create mode 100644 security/landlock/hooks_fs.c
>  create mode 100644 security/landlock/hooks_fs.h
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index e29d4c62a3c8..884289166a0e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -1920,5 +1920,10 @@ void __init loadpin_add_hooks(void);
>  #else
>  static inline void loadpin_add_hooks(void) { };
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK
> +extern void __init landlock_add_hooks(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void __init landlock_add_hooks(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
>
>  #endif /* ! __LINUX_LSM_HOOKS_H */
> diff --git a/security/landlock/Makefile b/security/landlock/Makefile
> index 7205f9a7a2ee..c0db504a6335 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/Makefile
> +++ b/security/landlock/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +ccflags-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) += -Werror=unused-function

Why is this needed? If it can't be avoided, a comment should exist
here explaining why.

> [...]
> @@ -127,3 +132,11 @@ static struct bpf_prog_type_list bpf_landlock_type __ro_after_init = {
>         .ops = &bpf_landlock_ops,
>         .type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK,
>  };
> +
> +void __init landlock_add_hooks(void)
> +{
> +       pr_info("landlock: Version %u", LANDLOCK_VERSION);
> +       landlock_add_hooks_fs();
> +       security_add_hooks(NULL, 0, "landlock");
> +       bpf_register_prog_type(&bpf_landlock_type);

I'm confused by the separation of hook registration here. The call to
security_add_hooks is with count=0 is especially weird. Why isn't this
just a single call with security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks,
ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks), "landlock")?

> +}
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index d0e07f269b2d..a3e9f4625991 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -64,10 +64,15 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>         loadpin_add_hooks();
>
>         /*
> -        * Load all the remaining security modules.
> +        * Load all remaining privileged security modules.
>          */
>         do_security_initcalls();
>
> +       /*
> +        * Load potentially-unprivileged security modules at the end.
> +        */
> +       landlock_add_hooks();

Oh, is this to make it last in the list? Is there a reason it has to be last?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-18 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-28 23:46 [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Landlock LSM: Toward unprivileged sandboxing Mickaël Salaün
     [not found] ` <20170328234650.19695-1-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-28 23:46   ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/11] bpf: Add eBPF program subtype and is_valid_subtype() verifier Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]     ` <20170328234650.19695-2-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-29 13:48       ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-18 21:48     ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/11] bpf,landlock: Define an eBPF program type for Landlock Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-16 21:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]   ` <20170328234650.19695-3-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 21:58     ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/11] bpf: Define handle_fs and add a new helper bpf_handle_fs_get_mode() Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] landlock: Add LSM hooks related to filesystem Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 15:18   ` kbuild test robot
     [not found]   ` <20170328234650.19695-5-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 22:17     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2017-04-18 22:44       ` Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]         ` <9a69055a-b4cf-00b0-da5e-2e45ff88059c-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 23:16           ` Casey Schaufler
2017-04-18 23:40             ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 22:03               ` Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]                 ` <35272f2b-ec5f-d032-ae2e-9fc0b4c0e2e3-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 23:58                   ` [kernel-hardening] " Casey Schaufler
2017-04-20  1:48                 ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:39         ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] seccomp: Split put_seccomp_filter() with put_seccomp() Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 22:23   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 22:47     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-19 22:18       ` Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]         ` <96024881-1bcc-33af-6285-d9a904de963e-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20  1:54           ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/11] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock events per process hierarchy Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 10:35   ` Djalal Harouni
2017-03-31 21:15     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 22:54       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
     [not found]   ` <20170328234650.19695-7-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 22:53     ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:24       ` Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]         ` <a3c71579-4238-0967-b61d-522859f740aa-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 23:48           ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/11] landlock: Add ptrace restrictions Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]   ` <20170328234650.19695-8-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-10  6:48     ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2017-04-11  7:19       ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/11] bpf: Add a Landlock sandbox example Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:06   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:35     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/11] seccomp: Enhance test_harness with an assert step mechanism Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]   ` <20170328234650.19695-10-mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19  0:02     ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 21:51       ` Mickaël Salaün
     [not found]         ` <94ac6ddc-eaac-8548-f83f-826ddf05ac69-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 22:02           ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 22:05             ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-20  1:50               ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/11] bpf,landlock: Add tests for Landlock Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:16   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:53     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:59       ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation " Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 15:58   ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-18 23:26 ` [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Landlock LSM: Toward unprivileged sandboxing Kees Cook
2017-04-19  0:12   ` Mickaël Salaün

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jJKNp8R5kZ1U=K7KwgnV=NvH5aoAbftA-05a_Sa4pOg1Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook-f7+t8e8rja9g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acme-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ast-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=daniel-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=drysdale-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=james.l.morris-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jann-XZ1E9jl8jIdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mic-WFhQfpSGs3bR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paul-r2n+y4ga6xFZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sargun-GaZTRHToo+CzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shuah-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).