Re: [patch v6 0/3] JTAG driver introduction

[Rick Altherr <raltherr-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Oleksandr Shamray
> <oleksandrs-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> SoC which are not equipped with JTAG master interface, can be built
>> on top of JTAG core driver infrastructure, by applying bit-banging of
>> TDI, TDO, TCK and TMS pins within the hardware specific driver.
>
> I guess you mean it should then use GPIO lines for bit-banging?
>
> I was wondering about how some JTAG clients like openOCD does
> this in some cases.
>

Many common uses of OpenOCD leverage USB devices, such as FTDI FT232R,
that have a command queue for bitbanging operations.  Managing these
via libusb is ugly but platform-agnostic.

> In my worst nightmare they export GPIO lines using
> the horrid ABI in /sys/gpio/*
>

https://sourceforge.net/p/openocd/code/ci/v0.10.0/tree/src/jtag/drivers/sysfsgpio.c

While that is certainly horrible (and slow), mapping in the GPIO
registers via /dev/mem strikes me as worse:

https://sourceforge.net/p/openocd/code/ci/v0.10.0/tree/src/jtag/drivers/bcm2835gpio.c

> In best case they use the GPIO character device or even
> libgpiod.
>
> But having a JTAG abstraction inside the kernel that can
> grab a few lines for JTAG defined in a device tree, ACPI DSDT
> or similar makes sense too, as it abstracts the hardware so the
> JTAG client can then just open whatever /dev/jtag0 is on the machine
> and go ahead without having to bother about what GPIO lines
> are connected exactly where.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html