From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fs, xfs: introduce MAP_DIRECT for creating block-map-sealed file ranges Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:15:08 -0700 Message-ID: References: <150277752553.23945.13932394738552748440.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <150277754211.23945.458876600578531019.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20170815124250.GG27505@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Jan Kara Cc: "linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" , Linux API , "Darrick J. Wong" , Dave Chinner , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux MM , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , linux-fsdevel , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Mon 14-08-17 23:12:22, Dan Williams wrote: >>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h >>> index ff151814a02d..73fdc0ada9ee 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h >>> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct { >>> struct mm_struct *vm_mm; /* The address space we belong to. */ >>> pgprot_t vm_page_prot; /* Access permissions of this VMA. */ >>> unsigned long vm_flags; /* Flags, see mm.h. */ >>> + unsigned long fs_flags; /* fs flags, see MAP_DIRECT etc */ >>> >>> /* >>> * For areas with an address space and backing store, >> >> Ah, OK, here are VMA flags I was missing in the previous patch :) But why >> did you create separate fs_flags field for this? on 64-bit archs there's >> still space in vm_flags and frankly I don't see why we should separate >> MAP_DIRECT or MAP_SYNC from other flags? > > Where would MAP_DIRECT go in the 32-bit case? > >> After all a difference in these >> flags must also prevent VMA merging (which you forgot to handle I think) >> and they need to be copied on split (which happens by chance even now). > > Ah, yes I did miss blocking the merge of a vma with MAP_DIRECT and one > without. However, the vma split path looks ok. The merge path already blocks merging vmas that have the ->close() operation defined in is_mergeable_vma().