From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66D1C43331 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87862074D for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FAHfTZHy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388499AbgDBOBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:01:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:41768 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732434AbgDBOBr (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:01:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1585836106; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=x06202PPsponxfSDbfvTzZWwYLXlP9C+BG2B0SFMxYo=; b=FAHfTZHy+iME/Jr0FgOHwqGRx38sxQDfevXvdN8aFtq1uobeWjeacIBODCx4C73jlyvVjG pL+r3Ot2O+RplbJjZE0LdxOZu3XQ2lxMhalhMTfL4QMVBn4FOzpnqnes5RX9kGTST/y6S2 k+CxFPRMRAsCv1n1Pihjjj7FRefkIpg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-102-72hyDqbUOuWMmr71FgHJ_g-1; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:01:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 72hyDqbUOuWMmr71FgHJ_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB0AB1084424; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mchristi.msp.csb (ovpn-118-19.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.118.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA8960BF3; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: mchristi@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl.2: doc PR_SET/GET_IO_FLUSHER - V4 To: Bart Van Assche , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, mhocko@suse.com, masato.suzuki@wdc.com, damien.lemoal@wdc.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org References: <20200402020850.7218-1-mchristi@redhat.com> <9eab1b92-6a44-616a-44b2-f1ee6475f6f0@acm.org> From: Michael Christie Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:01:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9eab1b92-6a44-616a-44b2-f1ee6475f6f0@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-api-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 04/01/2020 10:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-04-01 19:08, Mike Christie wrote: >> +.TP >> +.B PR_GET_IO_FLUSHER (Since Linux 5.6) >> +Return as the function result 1 if the caller is in the IO_FLUSHER st= ate and >> +0 if not. >=20 > Although I'm not at all a language expert, the word order at the start > of the above sentence seems a bit weird to me? >=20 Do you mean the "Return as the function result" part or something else? That is how the other commands worded it. It looks like I messed up and dropped the (). This is how they did it: "Return (as the function result)" I will resend with that fix. If I misunderstood you I will fix that too.