From: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
To: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
Prasun Kapoor <pkapoor@marvell.com>,
"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"frederic@kernel.org" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] "Task_isolation" mode
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:19:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c326dd17cab3a43e3e500636005e14b9c315d6cf.camel@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723154820.GA709@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 17:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 03:41:46PM +0000, Alex Belits wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 16:29 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > .
> > >
> > > This.. as presented it is an absolutely unreviewable pile of
> > > junk. It
> > > presents code witout any coherent problem description and
> > > analysis.
> > > And
> > > the patches are not split sanely either.
> >
> > There is a more complete and slightly outdated description in the
> > previous version of the patch at
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lore.kernel.org_lkml_07c25c246c55012981ec0296eee23e68c719333a.camel-40marvell.com_&d=DwIBAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=1qgvOnXfk3ZHJA3p7RIb6NFqs4SPPDyPI_PcwNFp8KY&m=shk9a5FDwktOZysSbFIjxmgUg-IPyw2UkbVAHGBhNV0&s=FFZaj-KanwqEiXYCdjd96JOgP_GAOnanpkw6bBvNrK4&e=
>
> Not the point, you're mixing far too many things in one go. You also
> have the patches split like 'generic / arch-1 / arch-2' which is
> wrong
> per definition, as patches should be split per change and not care
> about
> sily boundaries.
This follows the original patch by Chris Metcalf. There is a reason for
that -- per-architecture changes are independent from each other and
affect not just code but functionality that was implemented per-
architecture. To support more architectures, it will be necessary to do
it separately for each, and mark them supported with
HAVE_ARCH_TASK_ISOLATION. Having only some architectures supported does
not break anything for the rest -- architectures that are not covered,
would not have this functionality.
>
> Also, if you want generic entry code, there's patches for that here:
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_20200722215954.464281930-40linutronix.de&d=DwIBAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=1qgvOnXfk3ZHJA3p7RIb6NFqs4SPPDyPI_PcwNFp8KY&m=shk9a5FDwktOZysSbFIjxmgUg-IPyw2UkbVAHGBhNV0&s=nZXIviY7rva31KvPgSVnTacwFNbsmkdW0LxSTfYSiqg&e=
>
>
>
That looks useful. Why didn't Thomas Gleixner mention it in his
criticism of my approach if he already solved that exact problem, at
least for x86?
--
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-22 14:44 [PATCH v4 00/13] "Task_isolation" mode Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] task_isolation: vmstat: add quiet_vmstat_sync function Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] task_isolation: vmstat: add vmstat_idle function Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] task_isolation: userspace hard isolation from kernel Alex Belits
2020-10-01 13:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-04 14:44 ` [EXT] " Alex Belits
2020-10-04 23:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-05 18:52 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-10-06 10:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-17 1:13 ` Alex Belits
2020-10-17 1:08 ` Alex Belits
2020-10-17 16:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-17 16:15 ` Alex Belits
2020-10-17 20:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-06 11:01 ` Alex Belits
2020-10-01 14:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-04 15:01 ` [EXT] " Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] task_isolation: Add task isolation hooks to arch-independent code Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] task_isolation: Add xen-specific hook Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:53 ` [PATCH 06/13] task_isolation: Add driver-specific hooks Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] task_isolation: arch/x86: enable task isolation functionality Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:55 ` [PATCH 08/13] task_isolation: arch/arm64: " Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] task_isolation: arch/arm: " Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] task_isolation: don't interrupt CPUs with tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu() Alex Belits
2020-10-01 14:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-04 15:22 ` [EXT] " Alex Belits
2020-10-06 21:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-17 0:17 ` Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] task_isolation: net: don't flush backlog on CPUs running isolated tasks Alex Belits
2020-10-01 14:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-04 17:12 ` [EXT] " Alex Belits
2021-01-22 14:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-01-22 16:13 ` Paolo Abeni
2020-07-22 14:59 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] task_isolation: ringbuffer: don't interrupt CPUs running isolated tasks on buffer resize Alex Belits
2020-07-22 14:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] task_isolation: kick_all_cpus_sync: don't kick isolated cpus Alex Belits
2020-07-23 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] "Task_isolation" mode Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 15:41 ` [EXT] " Alex Belits
2020-07-23 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 16:19 ` Alex Belits [this message]
2020-07-23 15:18 ` Alex Belits
2020-07-23 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 16:50 ` Alex Belits
2020-07-23 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-24 3:00 ` [EXT] " Alex Belits
2020-07-24 16:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c326dd17cab3a43e3e500636005e14b9c315d6cf.camel@marvell.com \
--to=abelits@marvell.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pkapoor@marvell.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).