Linux-api Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Thomas Lindroth <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com>,
	dancol@google.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] "Locked" and "Pss" in /proc/*/smaps are the same
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:36:45 +0200
Message-ID: <ebf6c7fb-fec3-6a26-544f-710ed193c154@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69eb77f7-c8cc-fdee-b44f-ad7e522b8467@gmail.com>

+CC

On 07/01/2018 08:31 PM, Thomas Lindroth wrote:
> While looking around in /proc on my v4.14.52 system I noticed that
> all processes got a lot of "Locked" memory in /proc/*/smaps. A lot
> more memory than a regular user can usually lock with mlock().
> 
> commit 493b0e9d945fa9dfe96be93ae41b4ca4b6fdb317 (v4.14-rc1) seems
> to have changed the behavior of "Locked".
> 
> commit 493b0e9d945fa9dfe96be93ae41b4ca4b6fdb317
> Author: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
> Date:   Wed Sep 6 16:25:08 2017 -0700
> 
>     mm: add /proc/pid/smaps_rollup
> 
> Before that commit the code was like this. Notice the VM_LOCKED
> check.
> 
> seq_printf(m,
>            "Size:           %8lu kB\n"
>            "Rss:            %8lu kB\n"
>            "Pss:            %8lu kB\n"
>            "Shared_Clean:   %8lu kB\n"
>            "Shared_Dirty:   %8lu kB\n"
>            "Private_Clean:  %8lu kB\n"
>            "Private_Dirty:  %8lu kB\n"
>            "Referenced:     %8lu kB\n"
>            "Anonymous:      %8lu kB\n"
>            "LazyFree:       %8lu kB\n"
>            "AnonHugePages:  %8lu kB\n"
>            "ShmemPmdMapped: %8lu kB\n"
>            "Shared_Hugetlb: %8lu kB\n"
>            "Private_Hugetlb: %7lu kB\n"
>            "Swap:           %8lu kB\n"
>            "SwapPss:        %8lu kB\n"
>            "KernelPageSize: %8lu kB\n"
>            "MMUPageSize:    %8lu kB\n"
>            "Locked:         %8lu kB\n",
>            (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> 10,
>            mss.resident >> 10,
>            (unsigned long)(mss.pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)),
>            mss.shared_clean  >> 10,
>            mss.shared_dirty  >> 10,
>            mss.private_clean >> 10,
>            mss.private_dirty >> 10,
>            mss.referenced >> 10,
>            mss.anonymous >> 10,
>            mss.lazyfree >> 10,
>            mss.anonymous_thp >> 10,
>            mss.shmem_thp >> 10,
>            mss.shared_hugetlb >> 10,
>            mss.private_hugetlb >> 10,
>            mss.swap >> 10,
>            (unsigned long)(mss.swap_pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)),
>            vma_kernel_pagesize(vma) >> 10,
>            vma_mmu_pagesize(vma) >> 10,
>            (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) ?
>                 (unsigned long)(mss.pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)) : 0);
> 
> After that commit Locked is now the same as Pss. This looks like a
> mistake.
> 
> seq_printf(m,
>            "Rss:            %8lu kB\n"
>            "Pss:            %8lu kB\n"
>            "Shared_Clean:   %8lu kB\n"
>            "Shared_Dirty:   %8lu kB\n"
>            "Private_Clean:  %8lu kB\n"
>            "Private_Dirty:  %8lu kB\n"
>            "Referenced:     %8lu kB\n"
>            "Anonymous:      %8lu kB\n"
>            "LazyFree:       %8lu kB\n"
>            "AnonHugePages:  %8lu kB\n"
>            "ShmemPmdMapped: %8lu kB\n"
>            "Shared_Hugetlb: %8lu kB\n"
>            "Private_Hugetlb: %7lu kB\n"
>            "Swap:           %8lu kB\n"
>            "SwapPss:        %8lu kB\n"
>            "Locked:         %8lu kB\n",
>            mss->resident >> 10,
>            (unsigned long)(mss->pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)),
>            mss->shared_clean  >> 10,
>            mss->shared_dirty  >> 10,
>            mss->private_clean >> 10,
>            mss->private_dirty >> 10,
>            mss->referenced >> 10,
>            mss->anonymous >> 10,
>            mss->lazyfree >> 10,
>            mss->anonymous_thp >> 10,
>            mss->shmem_thp >> 10,
>            mss->shared_hugetlb >> 10,
>            mss->private_hugetlb >> 10,
>            mss->swap >> 10,
>            (unsigned long)(mss->swap_pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)),
>            (unsigned long)(mss->pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)));
> 
> The latest git has changed a bit but the functionality is the
> same.

----8<----
>From fa721521c981167c24ac8f4be446443d293d741e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:24:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix Locked field in /proc/pid/smaps*

Thomas reports:

: While looking around in /proc on my v4.14.52 system I noticed that
: all processes got a lot of "Locked" memory in /proc/*/smaps. A lot
: more memory than a regular user can usually lock with mlock().
:
: commit 493b0e9d945fa9dfe96be93ae41b4ca4b6fdb317 (v4.14-rc1) seems
: to have changed the behavior of "Locked".
:
: Before that commit the code was like this. Notice the VM_LOCKED
: check.
:
:          (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) ?
:               (unsigned long)(mss.pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)) : 0);
:
: After that commit Locked is now the same as Pss. This looks like a
: mistake.
:
: (unsigned long)(mss->pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)));

Indeed, the commit has added mss->pss_locked with the correct value that
depends on VM_LOCKED, but forgot to actually use it. Fix it.

Fixes: 493b0e9d945f ("mm: add /proc/pid/smaps_rollup")
Reported-by: Thomas Lindroth <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index e9679016271f..dfd73a4616ce 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
 		SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nSwap:           ", mss->swap);
 		SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nSwapPss:        ",
 						mss->swap_pss >> PSS_SHIFT);
-		SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nLocked:         ", mss->pss >> PSS_SHIFT);
+		SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nLocked:         ",
+						mss->pss_locked >> PSS_SHIFT);
 		seq_puts(m, " kB\n");
 	}
 	if (!rollup_mode) {
-- 
2.18.0

  reply index

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-01 18:31 Thomas Lindroth
2018-07-03  7:36 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2018-07-03  7:45   ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-03 16:20   ` Daniel Colascione
2018-07-04  8:46     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebf6c7fb-fec3-6a26-544f-710ed193c154@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=thomas.lindroth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-api Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/0 linux-api/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-api linux-api/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api \
		linux-api@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-api

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-api


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git