From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip v6 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 01:05:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152942433578.15209.14034551799624757792.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152942424698.15209.15245996287444292393.stgit@devbox>
Remove arch dependent setjump/longjump functions
and unused fields in kprobe_ctlblk for jprobes
from arch/x86.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h | 3 -
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 96 +---------------------------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 367d99cff426..06782c2efa04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -111,9 +111,6 @@ struct kprobe_ctlblk {
unsigned long kprobe_status;
unsigned long kprobe_old_flags;
unsigned long kprobe_saved_flags;
- unsigned long *jprobe_saved_sp;
- struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
- kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 6f4d42377fe5..1b2d1acba810 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@
#include "common.h"
-void jprobe_return_end(void);
-
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
@@ -690,10 +688,9 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
/*
* If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
* continue with normal processing. If we have a
- * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
- * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry
- * for jprobe processing, so get out doing nothing
- * more here.
+ * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, that means
+ * user handler setup registers to exit to another
+ * instruction, we must skip the single stepping.
*/
if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
@@ -1083,93 +1080,6 @@ int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
-int setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
- unsigned long addr;
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-
- kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
- kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = stack_addr(regs);
- addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
-
- /*
- * As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
- * owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g.
- * tailcall optimization. So, to be absolutely safe
- * we also save and restore enough stack bytes to cover
- * the argument area.
- * Use __memcpy() to avoid KASAN stack out-of-bounds reports as we copy
- * raw stack chunk with redzones:
- */
- __memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (kprobe_opcode_t *)addr, MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr));
- regs->ip = (unsigned long)(jp->entry);
-
- /*
- * jprobes use jprobe_return() which skips the normal return
- * path of the function, and this messes up the accounting of the
- * function graph tracer to get messed up.
- *
- * Pause function graph tracing while performing the jprobe function.
- */
- pause_graph_tracing();
- return 1;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(setjmp_pre_handler);
-
-void jprobe_return(void)
-{
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-
- /* Unpoison stack redzones in the frames we are going to jump over. */
- kasan_unpoison_stack_above_sp_to(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
-
- asm volatile (
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- " xchg %%rbx,%%rsp \n"
-#else
- " xchgl %%ebx,%%esp \n"
-#endif
- " int3 \n"
- " .globl jprobe_return_end\n"
- " jprobe_return_end: \n"
- " nop \n"::"b"
- (kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return);
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return_end);
-
-int longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
- u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
- struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
- void *saved_sp = kcb->jprobe_saved_sp;
-
- if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) &&
- (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
- if (stack_addr(regs) != saved_sp) {
- struct pt_regs *saved_regs = &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
- stack_addr(regs), saved_sp);
- printk(KERN_ERR "Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
- show_regs(saved_regs);
- printk(KERN_ERR "Current registers\n");
- show_regs(regs);
- BUG();
- }
- /* It's OK to start function graph tracing again */
- unpause_graph_tracing();
- *regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
- __memcpy(saved_sp, kcb->jprobes_stack, MIN_STACK_SIZE(saved_sp));
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
- return 1;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(longjmp_break_handler);
-
bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
{
bool is_in_entry_trampoline_section = false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 16:04 [PATCH -tip v6 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:04 ` [PATCH -tip v6 01/27] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:05 ` [PATCH -tip v6 02/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-06-19 16:05 ` [PATCH -tip v6 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:06 ` [PATCH -tip v6 04/27] ARC: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:06 ` [PATCH -tip v6 05/27] ARM: kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:07 ` [PATCH -tip v6 06/27] arm64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:07 ` [PATCH -tip v6 07/27] powerpc/kprobes: Remove jprobe powerpc implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` [PATCH -tip v6 08/27] ia64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` [PATCH -tip v6 09/27] MIPS: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` [PATCH -tip v6 10/27] s390/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:09 ` [PATCH -tip v6 11/27] sh: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:09 ` [PATCH -tip v6 12/27] sparc64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:10 ` [PATCH -tip v6 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:10 ` [PATCH -tip v6 14/27] kprobes/x86: Don't call ->break_handler() in x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:11 ` [PATCH -tip v6 15/27] ARC: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ARC kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:11 ` [PATCH -tip v6 16/27] ARM: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:12 ` [PATCH -tip v6 17/27] arm64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:12 ` [PATCH -tip v6 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in powerpc " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:13 ` [PATCH -tip v6 19/27] ia64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ia64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:13 ` [PATCH -tip v6 20/27] MIPS: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in MIPS " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:14 ` [PATCH -tip v6 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:14 ` [PATCH -tip v6 22/27] sh: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in SH " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:15 ` [PATCH -tip v6 23/27] sparc64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in sparc64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:15 ` [PATCH -tip v6 24/27] bpf: error-inject: kprobes: Clear current_kprobe and enable preempt in kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:16 ` [PATCH -tip v6 25/27] kprobes/x86: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:16 ` [PATCH -tip v6 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-06-19 16:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-06-20 8:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-20 8:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-21 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-21 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-22 6:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-22 6:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:17 ` [PATCH -tip v6 27/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe stub API Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-19 16:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152942433578.15209.14034551799624757792.stgit@devbox \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).