linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:11:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110713091130.GD2872@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUfHB=EtzDBhPr2ntn__0AC0NcCdi0e7NiwmKb0bZmBbg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, Yinghai.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 0005-0013 adds generic memblock free area iterator and gradually
> > replaces x86 specific memblock mechanism with generic one.
> 
> that is great, merge early_node_map into memblock array.

Yeah and with proper top down allocator and iterator, we should be
able to add back the early per-node allocaiton thing.

> looks it comes with some mismatch section warning...
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x120ba5): Section mismatch in reference from
> the function memblock_set_node() to the variable .init.data:memblock
> The function memblock_set_node() references
> the variable __initdata memblock.
> This is often because memblock_set_node lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong.

Oh, the __memblock_init thing.  Can you please attach .config you
used?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-13  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-12  9:15 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] memblock: Add optional region->nid Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:43   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  1:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14  9:44   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Use __memblock_alloc_base() in early_reserve_e820() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] memblock, x86: Make free_all_memory_core_early() explicitly free lowmem only Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 10/13] memblock, x86: Reimplement memblock_find_dma_reserve() using iterators Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:46   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:20     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:32         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:38           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:38             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:41             ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 21:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:46     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-27  0:59       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-27  8:07         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 23:26 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Yinghai Lu
2011-07-13  3:21   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-13  9:16     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13  9:11   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-13 19:06     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14  9:42 ` [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data] Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:00   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 21:24     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15  5:45     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-15  5:45       ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:49 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110713091130.GD2872@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).