From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:42:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20160321154201.GA6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1458147733-29338-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com> <1458147733-29338-5-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:57752 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756044AbcCUPmD (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:42:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1458147733-29338-5-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Chris Metcalf Cc: Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Aaron Tomlin , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Daniel Thompson , x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:02:13PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > index 9f7c21c22477..d569ae7fde37 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void) > /* > * We use this if we don't have any better idle routine.. > */ > -void default_idle(void) > +void __cpuidle default_idle(void) > { > trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id()); > safe_halt(); > @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > * with interrupts enabled and no flags, which is backwards compatible with the > * original MWAIT implementation. > */ > -static void mwait_idle(void) > +static __cpuidle void mwait_idle(void) > { > if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) { > trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id()); The most common idle function for x86 is: mwait_idle_with_hints(), trouble is, its an inline, so I'm not sure adding __cpuidle to it does anything. I've yet to find the magic objdump incantation to check. Or rather objdump -h doesn't appear to list .cpuidle.text at all :/ I'm probably doing something silly...