linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "zhaoxiu.zeng" <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/31] bitops: add parity functions
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:56:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160327175615.GA8864@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F7E24F.3040306@gmail.com>

> > Any particular reason that you select one approach over the other
> > in the different cases?
> 
> No particular reason, just like the architecture's __arch_hweightN.

The general recommendatiosn these days are to use static inline
for code to get better type check.
And it would also be nice to be consistent across architectures.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-27 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-24  3:03 [PATCH 01/31] bitops: add parity functions Zhaoxiu Zeng
2016-03-24  8:38 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-03-24 22:28   ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-26 22:08     ` Martin Kepplinger
2016-03-27  7:51       ` zhaoxiu.zeng
2016-03-27  3:33   ` zhaoxiu.zeng
2016-03-27 12:44     ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-03-27 13:38       ` zhaoxiu.zeng
2016-03-27 17:56         ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2016-03-28  2:44           ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-03-28  2:15         ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-03-28  6:51     ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-03-29  2:27       ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-03-29  2:56         ` Joe Perches
2016-03-29  2:56           ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160327175615.GA8864@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martink@posteo.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).