From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:59:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331085926.GB27831@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330133217.GV3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed 30-03-16 15:32:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I have tested on x86 with OOM situations with high mmap_sem contention
> > (basically many parallel page faults racing with many parallel mmap/munmap
> > tight loops) so the waiters for the write locks are routinely interrupted
> > by SIGKILL.
>
> Aside from the one niggle (as per the other email) they look good to me
> and I would take them through the tip/locking tree.
Thanks for the review! I understand that tip/locking would be the most
appropriate place but I am wondering whether this causes some issues
with the follow up patches which use this new API and which I expect to
go via Andrew's tree.
That being said I do not care much but then we have a potential
dependency between mmotm and tip/locking.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 12:58 [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-30 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 8:33 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 8:55 ` [PATCH] " Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] ia64, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] s390, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] sh, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] sparc, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] xtensa, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-03-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 8:59 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-03-31 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-31 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-31 10:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 10:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 17:03 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-01 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01 10:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 9:11 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-01 9:11 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160331085926.GB27831@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).