From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:39:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20160427143951.GH21011@pd.tnic> References: <20160426225553.13567.19459.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160322130058.GA16528@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <20160427140520.GG21011@pd.tnic> <20160427143045.GA4718@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160427143045.GA4718@amd> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > That does not answer the question. "Why would I want SME on my > system?". Because your question wasn't formulated properly. Here's some text from the 0th mail which you could've found on your own: "The following links provide additional detail: AMD Memory Encryption whitepaper: http://amd-dev.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wordpress/media/2013/12/AMD_Memory_Encryption_Whitepaper_v7-Public.pdf " > And that answer should go to Documentation/. It will. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:53253 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752485AbcD0Oj6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:39:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:39:51 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Message-ID: <20160427143951.GH21011@pd.tnic> References: <20160426225553.13567.19459.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160322130058.GA16528@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <20160427140520.GG21011@pd.tnic> <20160427143045.GA4718@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160427143045.GA4718@amd> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pavel Machek Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov Message-ID: <20160427143951.My2jEr1vwwk1cNYn1gK2ssMHLD2jb3BLeOWg1rcniqg@z> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > That does not answer the question. "Why would I want SME on my > system?". Because your question wasn't formulated properly. Here's some text from the 0th mail which you could've found on your own: "The following links provide additional detail: AMD Memory Encryption whitepaper: http://amd-dev.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wordpress/media/2013/12/AMD_Memory_Encryption_Whitepaper_v7-Public.pdf " > And that answer should go to Documentation/. It will. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.