From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCHv1 15/28] x86: detect 5-level paging support Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 21:05:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20161208200505.c6xiy56oufg6d24m@pd.tnic> References: <20161208162150.148763-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20161208162150.148763-17-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51227 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751577AbcLHUFP (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:05:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161208162150.148763-17-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 07:21:37PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > 5-level paging support is required from hardware when compiled with > CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y. We may implement runtime switch support later. > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov ... > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c > index 6687ab953257..26e9a287805f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c > @@ -80,6 +80,17 @@ static inline void cpuid(u32 id, u32 *a, u32 *b, u32 *c, u32 *d) > ); > } > > +static inline void cpuid_count(u32 id, u32 count, > + u32 *a, u32 *b, u32 *c, u32 *d) > +{ > + asm volatile(".ifnc %%ebx,%3 ; movl %%ebx,%3 ; .endif \n\t" > + "cpuid \n\t" > + ".ifnc %%ebx,%3 ; xchgl %%ebx,%3 ; .endif \n\t" > + : "=a" (*a), "=c" (*c), "=d" (*d), EBX_REG (*b) > + : "a" (id), "c" (count) > + ); > +} Pls make those like cpuid() and cpuid_count() in arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h, which explicitly assign ecx and then call the underlying helper. The cpuid() in cpuflags.c doesn't zero ecx which, if we have to be pedantic, it should do. It calls CPUID now with the ptr value of its 4th on 64-bit and 3rd arg on 32-bit, respectively, IINM. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.