From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCHv1 15/28] x86: detect 5-level paging support Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:33:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20161209163328.wixkda7fqm5rye5h@pd.tnic> References: <20161208162150.148763-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20161208162150.148763-17-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20161208200505.c6xiy56oufg6d24m@pd.tnic> <20161209153233.GA8932@node.shutemov.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:42668 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933734AbcLIQdk (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:33:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161209153233.GA8932@node.shutemov.name> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:32:33PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Something like this? > > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c > index 6687ab953257..366aad972025 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c > @@ -70,16 +70,22 @@ int has_eflag(unsigned long mask) > # define EBX_REG "=b" > #endif > > -static inline void cpuid(u32 id, u32 *a, u32 *b, u32 *c, u32 *d) > +static inline void cpuid_count(u32 id, u32 count, > + u32 *a, u32 *b, u32 *c, u32 *d) > { > + *a = id; > + *c = count; > + > asm volatile(".ifnc %%ebx,%3 ; movl %%ebx,%3 ; .endif \n\t" > "cpuid \n\t" > ".ifnc %%ebx,%3 ; xchgl %%ebx,%3 ; .endif \n\t" > : "=a" (*a), "=c" (*c), "=d" (*d), EBX_REG (*b) > - : "a" (id) > + : "a" (id), "c" (count) > ); > } > > +#define cpuid(id, a, b, c, d) cpuid_count(id, 0, a, b, c, d) LGTM. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.