From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/6] signal/sparc: Move EMT_TAGOVF into the generic siginfo.h
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:19:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180925171906.19683-1-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180925171901.mC0FPnsgVPmMSol9uA5YmOnkFKTV7hkFYKs2M_OXYsg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8idv6nw.fsf@xmission.com>
When moving all of the architectures specific si_codes into
siginfo.h, I apparently overlooked EMT_TAGOVF. Move it now.
Remove the now redundant test in siginfo_layout for SIGEMT
as now NSIGEMT is always defined.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 6 ------
include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
index e7049550ac82..6c820ea0813b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
@@ -17,10 +17,4 @@
#define SI_NOINFO 32767 /* no information in siginfo_t */
-/*
- * SIGEMT si_codes
- */
-#define EMT_TAGOVF 1 /* tag overflow */
-#define NSIGEMT 1
-
#endif /* _UAPI__SPARC_SIGINFO_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
index 80e2a7227205..1811b8101937 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
@@ -285,6 +285,12 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
#define SYS_SECCOMP 1 /* seccomp triggered */
#define NSIGSYS 1
+/*
+ * SIGEMT si_codes
+ */
+#define EMT_TAGOVF 1 /* tag overflow */
+#define NSIGEMT 1
+
/*
* sigevent definitions
*
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index e16278710b36..7b49c31d3fdb 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2856,7 +2856,7 @@ enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(int sig, int si_code)
[SIGSEGV] = { NSIGSEGV, SIL_FAULT },
[SIGBUS] = { NSIGBUS, SIL_FAULT },
[SIGTRAP] = { NSIGTRAP, SIL_FAULT },
-#if defined(SIGEMT) && defined(NSIGEMT)
+#if defined(SIGEMT)
[SIGEMT] = { NSIGEMT, SIL_FAULT },
#endif
[SIGCHLD] = { NSIGCHLD, SIL_CHLD },
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-25 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-25 17:16 [REVIEW][PATCH 0/6] signal: Shrinking the kernel's siginfo structure Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-09-25 17:19 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 1/6] signal/sparc: Move EMT_TAGOVF into the generic siginfo.h Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 2/6] signal: Fail sigqueueinfo if si_signo != sig Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-05 6:06 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-05 6:06 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-05 6:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-05 6:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-05 6:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-05 6:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-05 7:10 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 7/6] signal: In sigqueueinfo prefer sig not si_signo Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-05 7:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 3/6] signal: Remove the need for __ARCH_SI_PREABLE_SIZE and SI_PAD_SIZE Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 4/6] signal: Introduce copy_siginfo_from_user and use it's return value Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 5/6] signal: Distinguish between kernel_siginfo and siginfo Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 6/6] signal: Use a smaller struct siginfo in the kernel Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180925171906.19683-1-ebiederm@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).