From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw1-f67.google.com ([209.85.161.67]:46861 "EHLO mail-yw1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725919AbeJMCfQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 22:35:16 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j202-v6so5329095ywa.13 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com (mail-yb1-f175.google.com. [209.85.219.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k17-v6sm481415ywk.47.2018.10.12.12.01.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id e190-v6so5305188ybb.5 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8251564f-ba7a-1777-a606-dec472b32f35@canonical.com> References: <20181011001846.30964-1-keescook@chromium.org> <32stV62RmME8Dj5jKB8Z03zPe_Et72kMo71D8SpgSOHUo6SaROc8DomMWdk5jDGpyqVd8T63NIIK2NdDw95clpF8Uj47Wca2FBFItXDRh7E=@protonmail.ch> <38dde301-d77e-35fd-88d4-5cdc5b570ee8@canonical.com> <_CkJnKYmEZ4ZF0JtsSYuahAd9sgnX9OtcstjXaeqb8wn5uxfimc6S4jomly7If9VqnOXqXwaiCbJ9ttS6NiqE7n6cQUlwLvfO53paLmacvU=@protonmail.ch> <8251564f-ba7a-1777-a606-dec472b32f35@canonical.com> From: Kees Cook Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:01:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: John Johansen Cc: Jordan Glover , James Morris , Casey Schaufler , Stephen Smalley , Paul Moore , Tetsuo Handa , Mimi Zohar , Randy Dunlap , LSM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-arch , LKML Message-ID: <20181012190117.YhBdqeTpJ0dwVwhYHwyKgG6C7DMikRmrQVvNqG8XzIE@z> On Friday, October 12, 2018 3:19 AM, John Johansen wrote: > It isn't perfect but it manages consistency across distros as best as > can be achieved atm. Yeah, this is why I'm okay with the current series: it provides as consistent a view as possible, but leaves room for future improvements (like adding "+" or "!" or "all" or whatever). I'm curious to see what SELinux folks think of v5, though. I *think* I addressed all the concerns there, even Paul's "I want my distro default to not have extreme stacking" case too. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security