From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:36051 "EHLO
        atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727378AbeJRRYi (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:24:38 -0400
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:24:29 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/27] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XSAVES system states
Message-ID: <20181018092429.GA10861@amd>
References: <20181011151523.27101-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
 <20181011151523.27101-4-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
 <20181017104137.GE22535@zn.tnic>
 <32da559b-7958-60db-e328-f0eb316e668e@infradead.org>
 <20181017225829.GA32023@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181017225829.GA32023@zn.tnic>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20181018092429.XeE9v4yBqHEKx4T8HPU_M0XPiTXgpmDYJCNiiQN9f-U@z>


--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu 2018-10-18 00:58:29, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:39:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Would you mind explaining this request? (requirement?)
> > Other than to say that it is the preference of some maintainers,
> > please say Why it is preferred.
> >=20
> > and since the <type>s above won't typically be the same length,
> > it's not for variable name alignment, right?
>=20
> Searching the net a little, it shows you have asked that question
> before. So what is it you really wanna know?

Why do you think sorting local variables is good idea (for includes it
reduces collision, hopefully you don't have that for local variables),
and where is it documented in CodingStyle.

									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlvIUU0ACgkQMOfwapXb+vLuYwCffF5sBE4m1yg2zzM9Cn5YOb1i
rZsAnjdiBM6nrGcUURtx3ege7AefZD0x
=AiQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--