From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ v2 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:01:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20181019120159.GA14677@lst.de> References: <20181017080201.10866-1-hch@lst.de> <20181019070001.GA30556@lst.de> <20181019071057.GA31656@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Masahiro Yamada , Matt Porter , Alex Bounine , Dominik Brodowski , linux-kbuild , linux-pci , scsi , Linux-Arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:10 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:07:51AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Without this: > > > - It's hard to visually match your untagged cover letter with the > > > actual patches, > > > - Your individual patches lack the version info, so people cannot see which > > > version review comments in an email reply apply to. > > > > All of that is trivially solved by mail threading. > > You forgot to answer this question: > > | Can you please clarify what exactly that would mess up? It makes the already limited space in the subject line even shorted (or harder to read depending on which way you go) for absolutely not good reason. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45289 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726784AbeJSUHs (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:07:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:01:59 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ v2 Message-ID: <20181019120159.GA14677@lst.de> References: <20181017080201.10866-1-hch@lst.de> <20181019070001.GA30556@lst.de> <20181019071057.GA31656@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Masahiro Yamada , Matt Porter , Alex Bounine , Dominik Brodowski , linux-kbuild , linux-pci , scsi , Linux-Arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev Message-ID: <20181019120159.fPTish42AosD2xERxhnAAdBf43shQ4_3uoZeQFcTi0I@z> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:10 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:07:51AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Without this: > > > - It's hard to visually match your untagged cover letter with the > > > actual patches, > > > - Your individual patches lack the version info, so people cannot see which > > > version review comments in an email reply apply to. > > > > All of that is trivially solved by mail threading. > > You forgot to answer this question: > > | Can you please clarify what exactly that would mess up? It makes the already limited space in the subject line even shorted (or harder to read depending on which way you go) for absolutely not good reason.