From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38110 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725993AbeLKFuQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:50:16 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBB5nDiE084783 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:50:15 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pa22uugsb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:50:15 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:50:14 -0000 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] my generic mmu_gather patches In-Reply-To: <20180926113623.863696043@infradead.org> References: <20180926113623.863696043@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:20:01 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID: <87woogsjcm.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra , will.deacon@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, riel@surriel.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com Message-ID: <20181211055001.DRCMlIeEpRFkg7ehoPpPWlbWLK9csf62ArxVWrkGiD4@z> Peter Zijlstra writes: > Hi, > > Here is my current stash of generic mmu_gather patches that goes on top of Will's > tlb patches: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git tlb/asm-generic > > And they include the s390 patches done by Heiko. At the end of this, there is > not a single arch left with a custom mmu_gather. > > I've been slow posting these, because the 0-day bot seems to be having trouble > and I've not been getting the regular cross-build green light emails that I > otherwise rely upon. > > I hope to have addressed all the feedback from the last time, and I've added a > bunch of missing Cc's from last time. > > Please review with care. What is the update with this patch series? Looks good to be merged upstream? You can also add Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V to the series. -aneesh